ArticlePloS one2015
Age-Adjusted PSA Levels in Prostate Cancer Prediction: Updated Results of the Tyrol Prostate Cancer Early Detection Program.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- A guide to cancer screening.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Genomic alterations and associated outcomes in patients with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617.The oncologist · 2025Article
- An NMR-Based Metabolic Signature to Identify Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Biopsy.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Editorial for Special Topics: Imaging-Based Diagnosis for Prostate Cancer-State of the Art.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Screening for prostate cancer in a city in Japan: age-specific prostate-specific antigen cutoff thresholds.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- Phytotherapy Might Have a Role in Reducing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies: Results from an Exploratory, Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Different Phytotherapeutic Agents.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
- A big data-based prediction model for prostate cancer incidence in Japanese men.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Hospital-based prostate cancer screening in vietnamese men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a classification and regression tree model.BMC urology · 2022Article
- Validation of diagnostic nomograms based on CE-MS urinary biomarkers to detect clinically significant prostate cancer.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Biomarkers to personalize treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - a state of the art review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Review
- Time trends in prostate cancer screening in Swiss primary care (2010 to 2017) - A retrospective study.PloS one · 2019Article
- Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2018Article
- Serum levels of miR-320 family members are associated with clinical parameters and diagnosis in prostate cancer patients.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- ProPSA and the Prostate Health Index as predictive markers for aggressiveness in low-risk prostate cancer-results from an international multicenter study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2017Article
- Clinical application of free/total PSA ratio in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men over 50 years of age with total PSA levels of 2.0-25.0 ng mlAsian journal of andrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies in patients with benign prostatic disease, however, without missing significant PCa the present study re-evaluates the age-dependent PSA cut-offs in the Tyrol Prostate Cancer (PCa) early detection program. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe study population included 2225 patients who underwent prostate biopsy due to elevated PSA levels at our department. We divided our patient collective into four age groups: ≤49 years (n = 178), 50-59 years (n = 597), 60-69 years (n = 962) and ≥70 years (n = 488). We simulated different scenarios for PSA cut-off values between 1.25 and 6 ng/mL and fPSA% between 15 and 21% for all four age groups and calculated sensitivity, specificity, confidence intervals and predictive values.
resultsPCa was detected in 1218 men (54.7%). We found that in combination with free PSA ≤21% the following PSA cut-offs had the best cancer specificity: 1.75 ng/ml for men ≤49 years and 50-59 years, 2.25 ng/ml for men aged 60-69 years and 3.25 ng/ml for men ≥70 years. Using these adjusted PSA cut-off values all significant tumors are recognized in all age groups, yet the number of biopsies is reduced. Overall, one biopsy is avoided in 13 to 14 men (number needed to screen = 13.3, reduction of biopsies = 7.5%) when decision regarding biopsy is done according to the "new" cut-off values instead of the "old" ones. For the different age groups the number needed to screen to avoid one biopsy varied between 9.2 (≤49 years) and 17.4 (50-59 years).
conclusionWith "new", fine-tuned PSA cut-offs we detect all relevant PCa with a significant reduction of biopsies compared to the "old" cut-off values. Optimization of age-specific PSA cut-offs is one step towards a smarter strategy in the Tyrol PCa Early Detection Program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.