Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26218575›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

An Improved DNA Extraction Method for Efficient and Quantitative Recovery of Phytoplankton Diversity in Natural Assemblages.

Jian Yuan, Meizhen Li, Senjie Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterization of aMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microbiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  14. Development of a rapid detection method forFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Utility of a PCR-based method for rapid and specific detection of toxigenicJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jian YuanThe State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China; Marine Biodiversity and Global Change Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Meizhen LiThe State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China; Marine Biodiversity and Global Change Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Senjie LinThe State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China; Marine Biodiversity and Global Change Research Center, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China; The Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, Connecticut, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marine phytoplankton are highly diverse with different species possessing different cell coverings, posing challenges for thoroughly breaking the cells in DNA extraction yet preserving DNA integrity. While quantitative molecular techniques have been increasingly used in phytoplankton research, an effective and simple method broadly applicable to different lineages and natural assemblages is still lacking. In this study, we developed a bead-beating protocol based on our previous experience and tested it against 9 species of phytoplankton representing different lineages and different cell covering rigidities. We found the bead-beating method enhanced the final yield of DNA (highest as 2 folds) in comparison with the non-bead-beating method, while also preserving the DNA integrity. When our method was applied to a field sample collected at a subtropical bay located in Xiamen, China, the resultant ITS clone library revealed a highly diverse assemblage of phytoplankton and other micro-eukaryotes, including Archaea, Amoebozoa, Chlorophyta, Ciliphora, Bacillariophyta, Dinophyta, Fungi, Metazoa, etc. The appearance of thecate dinoflagellates, thin-walled phytoplankton and "naked" unicellular organisms indicates that our method could obtain the intact DNA of organisms with different cell coverings. All the results demonstrate that our method is useful for DNA extraction of phytoplankton and environmental surveys of their diversity and abundance.

Indexed as

BaysBiodiversityChemical FractionationChinaChlorophytaDiatomsDinoflagellidaDNADNA, RibosomalEnvironmental MonitoringFlow CytometryGenomePhylogenyPhytoplanktonDNADNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID26218575
PMCPMC4517865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.