Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26218075›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance Gene Abundance and Microbiota Composition in Feces of Organic and Conventional Pigs from Four EU Countries.

Lenka Gerzova, Vladimir Babak, Karel Sedlar, Marcela Faldynova, Petra Videnska, Darina Cejkova, Annette Nygaard Jensen, Martine Denis, Annaelle Kerouanton, Antonia Ricci and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DifferentMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lenka GerzovaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vladimir BabakVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Karel SedlarBrno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Marcela FaldynovaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Petra VidenskaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Darina CejkovaVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Annette Nygaard JensenTechnical University of Denmark, National Food Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martine DenisAnses, Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pig Products Unit, Ploufragan, France.
Annaelle KerouantonAnses, Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pig Products Unit, Ploufragan, France.
Antonia RicciIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Padova, Italy.
Veronica CibinIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Padova, Italy.
Julia ÖsterbergNational Veterinary Institute (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Ivan RychlikVeterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the recent trends in animal production is the revival of interest in organic farming. The increased consumer interest in organic animal farming is mainly due to concerns about animal welfare and the use of antibiotics in conventional farming. On the other hand, providing animals with a more natural lifestyle implies their increased exposure to environmental sources of different microorganisms including pathogens. To address these concerns, we determined the abundance of antibiotic resistance and diversity within fecal microbiota in pigs kept under conventional and organic farming systems in Sweden, Denmark, France and Italy. The abundance of sul1, sul2, strA, tet(A), tet(B) and cat antibiotic resistance genes was determined in 468 samples by real-time PCR and the fecal microbiota diversity was characterized in 48 selected samples by pyrosequencing of V3/V4 regions of 16S rRNA. Contrary to our expectations, there were no extensive differences between the abundance of tested antibiotic resistance genes in microbiota originating from organic or conventionally housed pigs within individual countries. There were also no differences in the microbiota composition of organic and conventional pigs. The only significant difference was the difference in the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in the samples from different countries. Fecal microbiota in the samples originating from southern European countries (Italy, France) exhibited significantly higher antibiotic resistance gene abundance than those from northern parts of Europe (Denmark, Sweden). Therefore, the geographical location of the herd influenced the antibiotic resistance in the fecal microbiota more than farm's status as organic or conventional.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryOrganic AgricultureAnimalsDrug Resistance, BacterialEuropean UnionFecesGenes, BacterialMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26218075
PMCPMC4517930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.