Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217815›Full record

ArticleData in brief2015

Sampling and composition of airborne particulate matter (PM10) from two locations of Mexico City.

Yolanda I Chirino, Yesennia Sánchez-Pérez, Álvaro Román Osornio-Vargas, Irma Rosas, Claudia María García-Cuellar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Airborne PMInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Effects of PMToxics · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Particulate matter (PMEnvironmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2020
    Article
  6. Zoning of air quality index (PMData in brief · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yolanda I ChirinoUnidad de Biomedicina, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Los Reyes Iztacala, CP 54090 Tlalnepantla, Estado de México, México.
Yesennia Sánchez-PérezInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Subdirección de Investigación Básica, San Fernando No. 22, Tlalpan, 14080 México, D.F., México.
Álvaro Román Osornio-VargasDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, 3-591 ECHA, 11405 87th Avenue, Edmonton, Canada T6G 1C9.
Irma RosasCentro de Ciencias de la Atmósfera, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Circuito Exterior s/n. Ciudad Universitaria, Del. Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, Mexico, D.F., Mexico.
Claudia María García-CuellarInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Subdirección de Investigación Básica, San Fernando No. 22, Tlalpan, 14080 México, D.F., México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PM10 airborne particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤10 µm is considered as a risk factor of various adverse health outcomes, including lung cancer. Here we described the sampling and composition of PM10 collected from an industrial zone (IZ), and a commercial zone (CZ) of Mexico City. The PM10 was collected with a high-volume sampler in the above mentioned locations and both types of PM10 sampled were characterized by the content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, and endotoxin. The endotoxin PM10 content from IZ and CZ displayed 138.4 UE/mg and 170.4 UE/mg of PM10, respectively.

Identifiers

PMID26217815
PMCPMC4510582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.