Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217700›Full record

ArticleData in brief2015

Data in support of comparative physiology and proteomic analysis of two wheat genotypes contrasting in drought tolerance.

Elham Faghani, Javad Gharechahi, Setsuko Komatsu, Mehdi Mirzaei, Ramzan Ali Khavarinejad, Farzaneh Najafi, Laleh Karimi Farsad, Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elham FaghaniDepartment of Systems Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Karaj, Iran.
Javad GharechahiDepartment of Systems Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Karaj, Iran.
Setsuko KomatsuNational Institute of Crop Science, Kannondai 2-1-18, Tsukuba 305-8518, Japan.
Mehdi MirzaeiDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ramzan Ali KhavarinejadFaculty of Science, Kharazmi University of Tehran, Iran.
Farzaneh NajafiFaculty of Science, Kharazmi University of Tehran, Iran.
Laleh Karimi FarsadDepartment of Systems Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Karaj, Iran.
Ghasem Hosseini SalekdehDepartment of Systems Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Karaj, Iran ; Department of Molecular Systems Biology at Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we present the data from a comparative physiology and proteomics approach used to analyze the response of two wheat genotypes (SERI M 82 (SE) and SW89.5193/kAu2 (SW)) with contrasting responses to drought stress. Proteomic analysis resulted in identification of 49 unique proteins with significant change in abundance (2-fold) under water shortage in roots and leaves. Gene ontology analysis of drought-responsive proteins (DRPs) suggested an induction of proteins related to cell wall biogenesis, ATP synthesis, photosynthesis, and carbohydrate/energy metabolism in leaves under stress condition. A large fraction of root proteins were identified to be involved in defense and oxidative stress response. In addition, a significant change was detected in proteins related to protein synthesis, ATP synthesis, and germin-like proteins in response to drought stress. A detailed analysis of this data may be obtained from Ref. [1].

Identifiers

PMID26217700
PMCPMC4459561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.