ArticleNeurophotonics2015
Optical coherence tomography for cross-sectional imaging of neural activity.
Article in Neurophotonics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- High Prevalence of Artifacts in Optical Coherence Tomography With Adequate Signal Strength.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Ultra-parallel label-free optophysiology of neural activity.iScience · 2022Article
- Optical Electrophysiology: Toward the Goal of Label-Free Voltage Imaging.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021Article
- Imaging localized fast optical signals of neural activation with optical coherence tomography in awake mice.Optics letters · 2021Article
- Nanosensitive optical coherence tomography to assess wound healing within the cornea.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Measurement and visualization of stimulus-evoked tissue dynamics in mouse barrel cortex using phase-sensitive optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Simulating optical coherence tomography for observing nerve activity: A finite difference time domain bi-dimensional model.PloS one · 2018Article
- Label-free optical detection of action potential in mammalian neurons.Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
- OCT intensity and phase fluctuations correlated with activity-dependent neuronal calcium dynamics in theBiomedical optics express · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We report a functional optical coherence tomography cross-sectional scanner to detect neural activity using unmyelinated nerves dissected from squid. The nerves, unstained or stained with a voltage-sensitive dye, were imaged in a nerve chamber. Transient phase changes from backscattered light were detected during action potential propagation. The results show that the scanner can provide high spatiotemporal resolution cross-sectional images of neural activity ([Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text]; [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text]). The advantage of this method compared to monitoring a single depth profile [Formula: see text] is a dramatic increase in the number of available sites that can be measured in two spatial dimensions [Formula: see text] with lateral scanning; therefore, the study demonstrates that two-dimensional monitoring of small-scale functional activity would also be feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.