Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217661›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2015

Cancer as a mitochondrial metabolic disease.

Thomas N Seyfried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cancer as an evolutionary reversal-time for a paradigm shift.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Does human cytomegalovirus provide a novel therapeutic target for patients with glioblastoma?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Carcinogenesis trajectories.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Metabolic theory of preeclampsia: implications for maternal cardiovascular health.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas N SeyfriedBiology Department, Boston College Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.

Funding

GLYCOSPHINGOLIPIDS IN MURINE NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASESR01HD039722 · NICHD · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI SEYFRIED, THOMAS N · 2001 to 2004
$852k
Glycosphingolipid Effects on Brain Tumor AngiogenesisR01CA102135 · NCI · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI SEYFRIED, THOMAS N · 2004 to 2006
$734k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102135NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD039722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is widely considered a genetic disease involving nuclear mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. This view persists despite the numerous inconsistencies associated with the somatic mutation theory. In contrast to the somatic mutation theory, emerging evidence suggests that cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease, according to the original theory of Otto Warburg. The findings are reviewed from nuclear cytoplasm transfer experiments that relate to the origin of cancer. The evidence from these experiments is difficult to reconcile with the somatic mutation theory, but is consistent with the notion that cancer is primarily a mitochondrial metabolic disease.

Indexed as

carcinogenesiscybridsfermentationmicroenvironmentmitochondriaoxidative phosphorylationtumorigenesisWarburg effect

Identifiers

PMID26217661
PMCPMC4493566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.