Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217536›Full record

ArticleBMC obesity2015

Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate a community-based summer camp for children with obesity: a prospective feasibility study.

Shauna M Burke, Sheree Shapiro, Robert J Petrella, Jennifer D Irwin, Michelle Jackman, Erin S Pearson, Harry Prapavessis, Joel Kevin Shoemaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC obesity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of a community-based, family focused healthy weights initiative using the RE-AIM framework.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shauna M BurkeSchool of Health Studies, Western University, London, Canada.
Sheree ShapiroHealth and Rehabilitation Sciences Program, Western University, London, Canada.
Robert J PetrellaDepartment of Family Medicine, Western University, London, Canada ; School of Kinesiology, Western University, London, Canada.
Jennifer D IrwinSchool of Health Studies, Western University, London, Canada.
Michelle JackmanSection of Hospital Pediatrics & Pediatric Centre for Weight & Health, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Canada.
Erin S PearsonSchool of Kinesiology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada.
Harry PrapavessisSchool of Kinesiology, Western University, London, Canada.
Joel Kevin ShoemakerSchool of Kinesiology, Western University, London, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing rates of childhood overweight and obesity highlight a need for the evaluation of lifestyle interventions. The purpose of the study was to determine the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance of a novel family-focused program targeting children with obesity (i.e., the Children's Health and Activity Modification Program [C.H.A.M.P.]) using the RE-AIM framework, an evaluation tool for community-based health interventions.

methodsA single-centre, single cohort interventional feasibility study was conducted over the course of two years. Children with obesity and their families completed a 4-week group-based lifestyle intervention in Year 1 (n = 15; M age = 10.6; 53% female) and/or Year 2 (n = 25; M age = 10.6; 56% female). Outcome variables were measured pre- and post-intervention, as well as 6- and 12-months following completion of the formal program.

resultsOverall, C.H.A.M.P. had high reach in terms of participant representativeness. In addition, participation in the program was associated with significantly improved standardized body mass index (BMI-z), body fat percentage, lean mass percentage, and child- and parent-proxy reported quality of life (QOL; effectiveness/individual maintenance). Furthermore, a number of community partnerships were built, strengthened, and maintained prior to, during, and following implementation of the two-year program (adoption/setting maintenance, respectively). Finally, the intervention was delivered as intended as evidenced by high adherence to the schedule, attendance rates, and cost effectiveness (implementation).

conclusionsBased on RE-AIM metrics, C.H.A.M.P. appears to be a promising childhood obesity program. The findings reported will inform researchers and practitioners on how to design and implement future community-based programs addressing pediatric obesity.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry, Study ID ISRCTN13143236. Registered 27 March 2015.

Indexed as

Childhood obesityCommunity interventionFamily healthFeasibilityGroup dynamicsProgram evaluationQuality of lifeRE-AIM

Identifiers

PMID26217536
PMCPMC4511021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.