Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217528›Full record

ArticleBMC obesity2015

A systematic review of how researchers characterize the school environment in determining its effect on student obesity.

Kyle Turner, Charlie Foster, Steven Allender, Emma Plugge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC obesity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyle TurnerNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF United Kingdom ; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Population Approaches to Non-Communicable Disease Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Charlie FosterNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF United Kingdom ; World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Population Approaches to Non-Communicable Disease Prevention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Steven AllenderWorld Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Burwood, 3125, Victoria Australia.
Emma PluggeNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LF United Kingdom.

Funding

Systems Science to Guide Whole-of-Community Childhood Obesity InterventionsR01HL115485 · NHLBI · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI ECONOMOS, CHRISTINA D, HAMMOND, ROSS A. · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity in early childhood is a robust predictor of obesity later in life. Schools provide unparalleled access to children and have subsequently become major intervention sites. However, empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of school-based interventions against childhood obesity is of limited scope and unknown quality. The aim of this systematic review is to critically assess how researchers have characterized the school environment in determining its effect on childhood weight status in order to improve the quality and consistency of research in this area. We conducted a narrative review with a systematic search of the literature in line with PRISMA guidelines (2009). Original peer-reviewed research articles in English were searched from Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from earliest record to January 2014. We included empirical research that reported at least one measure of the primary/elementary school environment and its relationship with at least one objective adiposity-related variable for students aged 4-12 years. Two authors independently extracted data on study design, school-level factors, student weight status, type of analysis and effect.

resultsFive studies met the inclusion criteria. Each study targeted different parts of the school environment and findings across the studies were not comparable. The instruments used to collect school-level data report no validity or reliability testing.

conclusionsOur review shows that researchers have used instruments of unknown quality to test if the school environment is a determinant of childhood obesity, which raises broader questions about the impact that schools can play in obesity prevention.

Indexed as

Childhood obesityEnvironmental measurementSchool

Identifiers

PMID26217528
PMCPMC4511531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.