Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217420›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2015

Clinic Design and Continuity in Internal Medicine Resident Clinics: Findings of the Educational Innovations Project Ambulatory Collaborative.

Maureen D Francis, Mark L Wieland, Sean Drake, Keri Lyn Gwisdalla, Katherine A Julian, Christopher Nabors, Anne Pereira, Michael Rosenblum, Amy Smith, David Sweet and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Longitudinality Matters: Qualitative Perspectives on a Longitudinal Clinical Experience in a Psychiatry Residency Training Program.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. X + Y (or Why Not?).Journal of general internal medicine · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinic First: 6 Actions to Transform Ambulatory Residency Training.Journal of graduate medical education · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Maureen D Francis
Mark L Wieland
Sean Drake
Keri Lyn Gwisdalla
Katherine A Julian
Christopher Nabors
Anne Pereira
Michael Rosenblum
Amy Smith
David Sweet
Kris Thomas
Andrew Varney
Eric Warm
David Wininger
Mark L Francis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany internal medicine (IM) programs have reorganized their resident continuity clinics to improve trainees' ambulatory experience. Downstream effects on continuity of care and other clinical and educational metrics are unclear.

methodsThis multi-institutional, cross-sectional study included 713 IM residents from 12 programs. Continuity was measured using the usual provider of care method (UPC) and the continuity for physician method (PHY). Three clinic models (traditional, block, and combination) were compared using analysis of covariance. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to analyze the effect of practice metrics and clinic model on continuity.

resultsUPC, reflecting continuity from the patient perspective, was significantly different, and was highest in the block model, midrange in combination model, and lowest in the traditional model programs. PHY, reflecting continuity from the perspective of the resident provider, was significantly lower in the block model than in combination and traditional programs. Panel size, ambulatory workload, utilization, number of clinics attended in the study period, and clinic model together accounted for 62% of the variation found in UPC and 26% of the variation found in PHY.

conclusionsClinic model appeared to have a significant effect on continuity measured from both the patient and resident perspectives. Continuity requires balance between provider availability and demand for services. Optimizing this balance to maximize resident education, and the health of the population served, will require consideration of relevant local factors and priorities in addition to the clinic model.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareFacility Design and ConstructionInternship and ResidencyModels, EducationalAmbulatory CareAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiffusion of InnovationEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansInternal MedicineMaleUnited StatesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID26217420
PMCPMC4507924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.