ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015
Novel molecular markers for the detection of methanogens and phylogenetic analyses of methanogenic communities.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methanogens: vital but threatened members of the human microbiome?Trends in microbiology · 2026Review
- Mining-impacted rice paddies select for Archaeal methylators and reveal a putative (Archaeal) regulator of mercury methylation.ISME communications · 2023Article
- Ecological Observations Based on Functional Gene Sequencing Are Sensitive to the Amplicon Processing Method.mSphere · 2022Article
- Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals novel archaeal and bacterial genomes from Amazonian forest and pasture soils.Microbial genomics · 2022Article
- Archaeal community dynamics in biogas fermentation at various temperatures assessed by mcrA amplicon sequencing using different primer pairs.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of acidogenesis products' effect on biogas production performed with metagenomics and isotopic approaches.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2021Article
- Microbiological Sulfide Removal-From Microorganism Isolation to Treatment of Industrial Effluent.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Alterations of the Viable Ileal Microbiota of the Gut Mucosa-Lymph Node Axis in Pigs Fed Phytase and Lactic Acid-Treated Cereals.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2020Article
- A Review of Landfill Microbiology and Ecology: A Call for Modernization With 'Next Generation' Technology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Different response of bacteria, archaea and fungi to process parameters in nine full-scale anaerobic digesters.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of deep sequenced methanogenic communities: identification of microorganisms responsible for methane production.Microbial cell factories · 2018Article
- Flow cytometric quantification, sorting and sequencing of methanogenic archaea based on FMicrobial cell factories · 2017Article
- Adaptation of Methanogenic Inocula to Anaerobic Digestion of Maize Silage.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Investigation of bacterial and archaeal communities: novel protocols using modern sequencing by Illumina MiSeq and traditional DGGE-cloning.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2016Article
- Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2-bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid.MicrobiologyOpen · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methanogenic Archaea produce approximately one billion tons of methane annually, but their biology remains largely unknown. This is partially due to the large phylogenetic and phenotypic diversity of this group of organisms, which inhabit various anoxic environments including peatlands, freshwater sediments, landfills, anaerobic digesters and the intestinal tracts of ruminants. Research is also hampered by the inability to cultivate methanogenic Archaea. Therefore, biodiversity studies have relied on the use of 16S rRNA and mcrA [encoding the α subunit of the methyl coenzyme M (methyl-CoM) reductase] genes as molecular markers for the detection and phylogenetic analysis of methanogens. Here, we describe four novel molecular markers that should prove useful in the detailed analysis of methanogenic consortia, with a special focus on methylotrophic methanogens. We have developed and validated sets of degenerate PCR primers for the amplification of genes encoding key enzymes involved in methanogenesis: mcrB and mcrG (encoding β and γ subunits of the methyl-CoM reductase, involved in the conversion of methyl-CoM to methane), mtaB (encoding methanol-5-hydroxybenzimidazolylcobamide Co-methyltransferase, catalyzing the conversion of methanol to methyl-CoM) and mtbA (encoding methylated [methylamine-specific corrinoid protein]:coenzyme M methyltransferase, involved in the conversion of mono-, di- and trimethylamine into methyl-CoM). The sensitivity of these primers was verified by high-throughput sequencing of PCR products amplified from DNA isolated from microorganisms present in anaerobic digesters. The selectivity of the markers was analyzed using phylogenetic methods. Our results indicate that the selected markers and the PCR primer sets can be used as specific tools for in-depth diversity analyses of methanogenic consortia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.