ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015
Individual predictors of sensorimotor adaptability.
Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypothesis testing governs strategic motor learning.NPJ science of learning · 2026Article
- Physical cognition in altered gravity: Link between sensorimotor and cognitive adaptability.iScience · 2026Article
- Sensory network segregation as a predictor of post spaceflight balance impairments and sensory re-weighting.NPJ microgravity · 2025Article
- Article
- Examining individual learning patterns using generalised linear mixed models.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- EEG error-related potentials encode magnitude of errors and individual perceptual thresholds.iScience · 2023Article
- Cognition in zero gravity: Effects of non-terrestrial gravity on human behaviour.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- Age differences in the functional architecture of the human brain.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022Article
- Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.Journal of neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Ocular counter-roll is less affected in experienced versus novice space crew after long-duration spaceflight.NPJ microgravity · 2022Article
- A review of alterations to the brain during spaceflight and the potential relevance to crew in long-duration space exploration.NPJ microgravity · 2021Review
- Individual Differences in Sensorimotor Adaptation Are Conserved Over Time and Across Force-Field Tasks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Developing Proprioceptive Countermeasures to Mitigate Postural and Locomotor Control Deficits After Long-Duration Spaceflight.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Review
- COMPASS: Computations for Orientation and Motion Perception in Altered Sensorimotor States.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- Individual movement features during prism adaptation correlate with after-effects and interlimb transfer.Psychological research · 2020Article
- Repetition Without Repetition: Challenges in Understanding Behavioral Flexibility in Motor Skill.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Alterations of Functional Brain Connectivity After Long-Duration Spaceflight as Revealed by fMRI.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Neural correlates of multi-day learning and savings in sensorimotor adaptation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Proprioceptive loss and the perception, control and learning of arm movements in humans: evidence from sensory neuronopathy.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Neural predictors of sensorimotor adaptation rate and savings.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are large individual variations in strategies and rates of sensorimotor adaptation to spaceflight. This is seen in both the magnitude of performance disruptions when crewmembers are first exposed to microgravity, and in the rate of re-adaptation when they return to Earth's gravitational environment. Understanding the sources of this variation can lead to a better understanding of the processes underlying adaptation, as well as provide insight into potential routes for facilitating performance of "slow adapters". Here we review the literature on brain, behavioral, and genetic predictors of motor learning, recovery of motor function following neural insult, and sensorimotor adaptation. For example, recent studies have identified specific genetic polymorphisms that are associated with faster adaptation on manual joystick tasks and faster recovery of function following a stroke. Moreover, the extent of recruitment of specific brain regions during learning and adaptation has been shown to be predictive of the magnitude of subsequent learning. We close with suggestions for forward work aimed at identifying predictors of spaceflight adaptation success. Identification of "slow adapters" prior to spaceflight exposure would allow for more targeted preflight training and/or provision of booster training and adaptation adjuncts during spaceflight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.