ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2015
A common evolutionary origin for the ON- and OFF-edge motion detection pathways of the Drosophila visual system.
Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Temporal and Notch identity determine neuropil targeting depth and synapse location in the fly visual system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Network Statistics of the Whole-Brain Connectome ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Matched function of the neuropil processing optic flow in flies and crabs: the lobula plate mediates optomotor responses inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- A combinatorial code of transcription factors specifies subtypes of visual motion-sensing neurons inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2020Article
- How fly neurons compute the direction of visual motion.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020Review
- Article
- Transcriptional control of morphological properties of direction-selective T4/T5 neurons inDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2019Article
- Article
- The Organization of the Second Optic Chiasm of theFrontiers in neural circuits · 2019Article
- Generation and Evolution of Neural Cell Types and Circuits: Insights from the Drosophila Visual System.Annual review of genetics · 2017Review
- Parallel Computations in Insect and Mammalian Visual Motion Processing.Current biology : CB · 2016Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synaptic circuits for identified behaviors in the Drosophila brain have typically been considered from either a developmental or functional perspective without reference to how the circuits might have been inherited from ancestral forms. For example, two candidate pathways for ON- and OFF-edge motion detection in the visual system act via circuits that use respectively either T4 or T5, two cell types of the fourth neuropil, or lobula plate (LOP), that exhibit narrow-field direction-selective responses and provide input to wide-field tangential neurons. T4 or T5 both have four subtypes that terminate one each in the four strata of the LOP. Representatives are reported in a wide range of Diptera, and both cell types exhibit various similarities in: (1) the morphology of their dendritic arbors; (2) their four morphological and functional subtypes; (3) their cholinergic profile in Drosophila; (4) their input from the pathways of L3 cells in the first neuropil, or lamina (LA), and by one of a pair of LA cells, L1 (to the T4 pathway) and L2 (to the T5 pathway); and (5) their innervation by a single, wide-field contralateral tangential neuron from the central brain. Progenitors of both also express the gene atonal early in their proliferation from the inner anlage of the developing optic lobe, being alone among many other cell type progeny to do so. Yet T4 receives input in the second neuropil, or medulla (ME), and T5 in the third neuropil or lobula (LO). Here we suggest that these two cell types were originally one, that their ancestral cell population duplicated and split to innervate separate ME and LO neuropils, and that a fiber crossing-the internal chiasma-arose between the two neuropils. The split most plausibly occurred, we suggest, with the formation of the LO as a new neuropil that formed when it separated from its ancestral neuropil to leave the ME, suggesting additionally that ME input neurons to T4 and T5 may also have had a common origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.