Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217169›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2015

Robustness of spiking Deep Belief Networks to noise and reduced bit precision of neuro-inspired hardware platforms.

Evangelos Stromatias, Daniel Neil, Michael Pfeiffer, Francesco Galluppi, Steve B Furber, Shih-Chii Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Surrogate gradients for analog neuromorphic computing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Unsupervised Feature Learning With Winner-Takes-All Based STDP.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Convolutional networks for fast, energy-efficient neuromorphic computing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evangelos StromatiasAdvanced Processor Technologies Group, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester Manchester, UK.
Daniel NeilInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael PfeifferInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Francesco GalluppiCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7210, Equipe de Vision et Calcul Naturel, Vision Institute, UMR S968 Inserm, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris, France.
Steve B FurberAdvanced Processor Technologies Group, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester Manchester, UK.
Shih-Chii LiuInstitute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and ETH Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly large deep learning architectures, such as Deep Belief Networks (DBNs) are the focus of current machine learning research and achieve state-of-the-art results in different domains. However, both training and execution of large-scale Deep Networks require vast computing resources, leading to high power requirements and communication overheads. The on-going work on design and construction of spike-based hardware platforms offers an alternative for running deep neural networks with significantly lower power consumption, but has to overcome hardware limitations in terms of noise and limited weight precision, as well as noise inherent in the sensor signal. This article investigates how such hardware constraints impact the performance of spiking neural network implementations of DBNs. In particular, the influence of limited bit precision during execution and training, and the impact of silicon mismatch in the synaptic weight parameters of custom hybrid VLSI implementations is studied. Furthermore, the network performance of spiking DBNs is characterized with regard to noise in the spiking input signal. Our results demonstrate that spiking DBNs can tolerate very low levels of hardware bit precision down to almost two bits, and show that their performance can be improved by at least 30% through an adapted training mechanism that takes the bit precision of the target platform into account. Spiking DBNs thus present an important use-case for large-scale hybrid analog-digital or digital neuromorphic platforms such as SpiNNaker, which can execute large but precision-constrained deep networks in real time.

Indexed as

Deep Belief Networksneuro-inspired hardwarenoise robustnessspiking neural networksSpiNNaker

Identifiers

PMID26217169
PMCPMC4496577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.