Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217168›Full record

ArticleThe arabidopsis book2015

A Journey Through a Leaf: Phenomics Analysis of Leaf Growth in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Hannes Vanhaeren, Nathalie Gonzalez, Dirk Inzé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The arabidopsis book, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PhenoWell®-A novel screening system for soil-grown plants.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mass Spectrometry Imaging ofJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannes VanhaerenDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, B-9052 Gent, Belgium ; Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9052 Gent, Belgium.
Nathalie GonzalezDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, B-9052 Gent, Belgium ; Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9052 Gent, Belgium.
Dirk InzéDepartment of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, B-9052 Gent, Belgium ; Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9052 Gent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Arabidopsis, leaves contribute to the largest part of the aboveground biomass. In these organs, light is captured and converted into chemical energy, which plants use to grow and complete their life cycle. Leaves emerge as a small pool of cells at the vegetative shoot apical meristem and develop into planar, complex organs through different interconnected cellular events. Over the last decade, numerous phenotyping techniques have been developed to visualize and quantify leaf size and growth, leading to the identification of numerous genes that contribute to the final size of leaves. In this review, we will start at the Arabidopsis rosette level and gradually zoom in from a macroscopic view on leaf growth to a microscopic and molecular view. Along this journey, we describe different techniques that have been key to identify important events during leaf development and discuss approaches that will further help unraveling the complex cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie leaf growth.

Identifiers

PMID26217168
PMCPMC4513694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.