Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26217162›Full record

ArticleEJC supplements : EJC : official journal of EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ... [et al.]2014

Current knowledge and future research directions in treatment-related second primary malignancies.

Lindsay M Morton, Anthony J Swerdlow, Michael Schaapveld, Safaa Ramadan, David C Hodgson, John Radford, Flora E van Leeuwen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJC supplements : EJC : official journal of EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer ... [et al.], 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mutagenic Consequences of Sublethal Cell Death Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Lindsay M MortonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Anthony J SwerdlowThe Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
Michael SchaapveldDepartment of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Safaa RamadanEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
David C HodgsonRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John RadfordThe University of Manchester and The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Flora E van LeeuwenDepartment of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEInstitute of Cancer Research · GBNational Health Service · GBUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Studies of Populations Exposed to Therapeutic Medical Radiation and Other AgentsZIACP010131 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI MORTON, LINDSAY · 2009 to 2025
$81.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, 17-19% of all new primary malignancies occur in survivors of cancer, causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Research has shown that cancer treatments are important contributors to second malignant neoplasm (SMN) risk. In this paper we summarise current knowledge with regard to treatment-related SMNs and provide recommendations for future research. We address the risks associated with radiotherapy and systemic treatments, modifying factors of treatment-related risks (genetic susceptibility, lifestyle) and the potential benefits of screening and interventions. Research priorities were identified during a workshop at the 2014 Cancer Survivorship Summit organised by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Recently, both systemic cancer treatments and radiotherapy approaches have evolved rapidly, with the carcinogenic potential of new treatments being unknown. Also, little knowledge is available about modifying factors of treatment-associated risk, such as genetic variants and lifestyle. Therefore, large prospective studies with biobanking, high quality treatment data (radiation dose-volume, cumulative drug doses), and data on other cancer risk factors are needed. International collaboration will be essential to have adequate statistical power for such investigations. While screening for SMNs is included in several follow-up guidelines for cancer survivors, its effectiveness in this special population has not been demonstrated. Research into the pathogenesis, tumour characteristics and survival of SMNs is essential, as well as the development of interventions to reduce SMN-related morbidity and mortality. Prediction models for SMN risk are needed to inform initial treatment decisions, balancing chances of cure and SMNs and to identify high-risk subgroups of survivors eligible for screening.

Indexed as

ChemotherapyMultiple primary malignancies or multiple primary neoplasmsRadiotherapyTreatment-induced

Identifiers

PMID26217162
PMCPMC4250537
OpenAlexW2026506094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.