Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26216993›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Novel serologic biomarkers provide accurate estimates of recent Plasmodium falciparum exposure for individuals and communities.

Danica A Helb, Kevin K A Tetteh, Philip L Felgner, Jeff Skinner, Alan Hubbard, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, Harriet Mayanja-Kizza, Isaac Ssewanyana, Moses R Kamya, James G Beeson and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fine-scale heterogeneity inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Trial
  3. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Danica A HelbDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110; Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; Global Health Group, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-7769
Kevin K A TettehDepartment Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom;
Philip L FelgnerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697;
Jeff SkinnerLaboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20852;
Alan HubbardDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
Emmanuel ArinaitweInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda;
Harriet Mayanja-KizzaDepartment of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda;
Isaac SsewanyanaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda;
Moses R KamyaDepartment of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda;
James G BeesonCenter for Biomedical Research, Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health, Melbourne, VIC, Canada 3004;
Jordan TapperoCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333;
David L SmithSpatial Ecology and Epidemiology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom; Sanaria Institute for Global Health and Tropical Medicine, Rockville, MD 20850.
Peter D CromptonLaboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20852;
Philip J RosenthalDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Grant DorseyDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110;
Christopher J DrakeleyDepartment Immunology and Infection, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom;
Bryan GreenhouseDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110; bryan.greenhouse@ucsf.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of naturally-acquired immunity to malaria and clinical trials of anti-malaria monoclonal antibodiesZIAAI001155 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CROMPTON, PETER · 2011 to 2025
$30.9M
Transmission ProjectU19AI089674 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Joaniter Immaculate Nankabirwa · 2010 to 2026
$29.3M
TransmissionU19AI089686 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ZIMMERMAN, PETER A. · 2010 to 2016
$9.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089674NIAID NIH HHS U19AI089674NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089686PEPFARPHS HHS OCCU024421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tools to reliably measure Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) exposure in individuals and communities are needed to guide and evaluate malaria control interventions. Serologic assays can potentially produce precise exposure estimates at low cost; however, current approaches based on responses to a few characterized antigens are not designed to estimate exposure in individuals. Pf-specific antibody responses differ by antigen, suggesting that selection of antigens with defined kinetic profiles will improve estimates of Pf exposure. To identify novel serologic biomarkers of malaria exposure, we evaluated responses to 856 Pf antigens by protein microarray in 186 Ugandan children, for whom detailed Pf exposure data were available. Using data-adaptive statistical methods, we identified combinations of antibody responses that maximized information on an individual's recent exposure. Responses to three novel Pf antigens accurately classified whether an individual had been infected within the last 30, 90, or 365 d (cross-validated area under the curve = 0.86-0.93), whereas responses to six antigens accurately estimated an individual's malaria incidence in the prior year. Cross-validated incidence predictions for individuals in different communities provided accurate stratification of exposure between populations and suggest that precise estimates of community exposure can be obtained from sampling a small subset of that community. In addition, serologic incidence predictions from cross-sectional samples characterized heterogeneity within a community similarly to 1 y of continuous passive surveillance. Development of simple ELISA-based assays derived from the successful selection strategy outlined here offers the potential to generate rich epidemiologic surveillance data that will be widely accessible to malaria control programs.

Indexed as

Residence CharacteristicsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntibody FormationAntibody SpecificityAntigens, ProtozoanBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGene OntologyGeographyHumansIncidenceMalaria, FalciparumMaleMaliAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanBiomarkersantigen discoveryepidemiologyimmunoepidemiologyPlasmodium falciparum malariaserology

Identifiers

PMID26216993
PMCPMC4538641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.