Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26216278›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2015

A group ICA based framework for evaluating resting fMRI markers when disease categories are unclear: application to schizophrenia, bipolar, and schizoaffective disorders.

Yuhui Du, Godfrey D Pearlson, Jingyu Liu, Jing Sui, Qingbao Yu, Hao He, Eduardo Castro, Vince D Calhoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The overlap across psychotic disorders: A functional network connectivity analysis.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuhui DuThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, NM, USA; School of Information and Communication Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan, China. Electronic address: ydu@mrn.org.
Godfrey D PearlsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford, CT, USA.
Jingyu LiuThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Jing SuiThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Brainnetome Center and National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qingbao YuThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Hao HeThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Eduardo CastroThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ABBOTT, CHRISTOPHER C · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAP20RR021938 · NCRR · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI JUNG, REX · 2008 to 2011
$9.4M
Quantitative Neuroimaging in Psychosis; DTI StudiesR37MH043775 · NIMH · HARTFORD HOSPITAL · PI PEARLSON, GODFREY D · 2005 to 2012
$4.8M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
Integration of brain imaging with genomic and epigenomic dataR01MH104680 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, DENG, HONG-WEN · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P20RR021938NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR021938NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103472NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104680NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH043775NIMH NIH HHS R37MH43775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BP) and schizoaffective disorder (SAD) share some common symptoms, and there is still a debate about whether SAD is an independent category. To the best of our knowledge, no study has been done to differentiate these three disorders or to investigate the distinction of SAD as an independent category using fMRI data. This study is aimed to explore biomarkers from resting-state fMRI networks for differentiating these disorders and investigate the relationship among these disorders based on fMRI networks with an emphasis on SAD. Firstly, a novel group ICA method, group information guided independent component analysis (GIG-ICA), was applied to extract subject-specific brain networks from fMRI data of 20 healthy controls (HC), 20 SZ patients, 20 BP patients, 20 patients suffering from SAD with manic episodes (SADM), and 13 patients suffering from SAD with depressive episodes exclusively (SADD). Then, five-level one-way analysis of covariance and multiclass support vector machine recursive feature elimination were employed to identify discriminative regions from the networks. Subsequently, the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) projection and the hierarchical clustering were implemented to investigate the relationship among those groups. Finally, to evaluate the generalization ability, 16 new subjects were classified based on the found regions and the trained model using original 93 subjects. Results show that the discriminative regions mainly included frontal, parietal, precuneus, cingulate, supplementary motor, cerebellar, insula and supramarginal cortices, which performed well in distinguishing different groups. SADM and SADD were the most similar to each other, although SADD had greater similarity to SZ compared to other groups, which indicates that SAD may be an independent category. BP was closer to HC compared with other psychotic disorders. In summary, resting-state fMRI brain networks extracted via GIG-ICA provide a promising potential to differentiate SZ, BP, and SAD.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBipolar DisorderBrain MappingData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBiomarkersBipolar disorderFunctional magnetic resonance imagingIndependent component analysisResting-state brain intrinsic networksSchizoaffective disorderSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID26216278
PMCPMC4618037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.