Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26216192›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2015

Functional Networks of Highest-Connected Splice Isoforms: From The Chromosome 17 Human Proteome Project.

Hong-Dong Li, Rajasree Menon, Brandon Govindarajoo, Bharat Panwar, Yang Zhang, Gilbert S Omenn, Yuanfang Guan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Integrative functional genomic analysis of intron retention in human and mouse brain with Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Assessing the functional relevance of splice isoforms.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hong-Dong LiDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, ‡Department of Internal Medicine, §Department of Human Genetics and School of Public Health, ∥Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Rajasree MenonDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, ‡Department of Internal Medicine, §Department of Human Genetics and School of Public Health, ∥Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Brandon GovindarajooDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, ‡Department of Internal Medicine, §Department of Human Genetics and School of Public Health, ∥Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Bharat PanwarDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, ‡Department of Internal Medicine, §Department of Human Genetics and School of Public Health, ∥Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, ‡Department of Internal Medicine, §Department of Human Genetics and School of Public Health, ∥Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Gilbert S OmennDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, ‡Department of Internal Medicine, §Department of Human Genetics and School of Public Health, ∥Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Yuanfang GuanDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, ‡Department of Internal Medicine, §Department of Human Genetics and School of Public Health, ∥Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
University of Michigan Postbaccalaureate Research Education Program (UM PREP)R25GM086262 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALLEN, BENJAMIN · 2009 to 2024
$6.1M
Machine Learning for Drug Response PredictionR35GM133346 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Yuanfang Guan · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
Integrating context-specific networks to predict ataxia genesR21NS082212 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BURMEISTER, MARGIT, GUAN, YUANFANG · 2013 to 2014
$426k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS U54ES017885NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM086262NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133346NINDS NIH HHS 1R21NS082212-01NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS082212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative splicing allows a single gene to produce multiple transcript-level splice isoforms from which the translated proteins may show differences in their expression and function. Identifying the major functional or canonical isoform is important for understanding gene and protein functions. Identification and characterization of splice isoforms is a stated goal of the HUPO Human Proteome Project and of neXtProt. Multiple efforts have catalogued splice isoforms as "dominant", "principal", or "major" isoforms based on expression or evolutionary traits. In contrast, we recently proposed highest connected isoforms (HCIs) as a new class of canonical isoforms that have the strongest interactions in a functional network and revealed their significantly higher (differential) transcript-level expression compared to nonhighest connected isoforms (NCIs) regardless of tissues/cell lines in the mouse. HCIs and their expression behavior in the human remain unexplored. Here we identified HCIs for 6157 multi-isoform genes using a human isoform network that we constructed by integrating a large compendium of heterogeneous genomic data. We present examples for pairs of transcript isoforms of ABCC3, RBM34, ERBB2, and ANXA7. We found that functional networks of isoforms of the same gene can show large differences. Interestingly, differential expression between HCIs and NCIs was also observed in the human on an independent set of 940 RNA-seq samples across multiple tissues, including heart, kidney, and liver. Using proteomic data from normal human retina and placenta, we showed that HCIs are a promising indicator of expressed protein isoforms exemplified by NUDFB6 and M6PR. Furthermore, we found that a significant percentage (20%, p = 0.0003) of human and mouse HCIs are homologues, suggesting their conservation between species. Our identified HCIs expand the repertoire of canonical isoforms and are expected to facilitate studying main protein products, understanding gene regulation, and possibly evolution. The network is available through our web server as a rich resource for investigating isoform functional relationships (http://guanlab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/hisonet). All MS/MS data were available at ProteomeXchange Web site (http://www.proteomexchange.org) through their identifiers (retina: PXD001242, placenta: PXD000754).

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingChromosomes, Human, Pair 17ProteomeAnimalsHumansMiceProtein IsoformsProteinsRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNAProtein IsoformsProteinsProteomeRNA, Messengeralternative splicingcanonical isoformshighest connected isoformsisoform networks

Identifiers

PMID26216192
PMCPMC4993635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.