Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26216126›Full record

ArticleHIV medicine2016

Non-HIV-related health care utilization, demographic, clinical and laboratory factors associated with time to initial retention in HIV care among HIV-positive individuals linked to HIV care.

L Lourenço, A Nohpal, D Shopin, G Colley, B Nosyk, J S G Montaner, V D Lima, Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HIV medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Multidisciplinary Care Models in HIV/AIDS Care: A Wholistic Approach.Rehabilitation oncology (American Physical Therapy Association. Oncology Section) · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

L LourençoBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
A NohpalBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
D ShopinBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
G ColleyBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
B NosykBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J S G MontanerBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
V D LimaBritish Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS Study Group

Funding

Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV & AIDS (STOP HIV/AIDS) in BCR01DA036307 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI MONTANER, JULIO SERGIO GONZALEZ · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Modeling different strategies to reduce the public health impact of the HCV/HIV eR03DA033851 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI LIMA, VIVIANE DIAS · 2012 to 2013
$55k
CIHR 125948-1CIHR 129971-1CIHR MOP-125948NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036307NIDA NIH HHS R01DA036307NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA033851NIDA NIH HHS R03DA033851-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the study was to explore non-HIV-related health care service (NHRHS) utilization, demographic, clinical and laboratory factors associated with timely initial "retention" in HIV care among individuals "linked" to HIV care in British Columbia (BC), Canada.

methodsWe conducted a Weibull time-to-initial-retention analysis among BC Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS (STOP HIV/AIDS) cohort participants linked in 2000-2010, who had ≥ 1 year of follow-up. We defined "linked" as the first HIV-related service accessed following HIV diagnosis and "retained" as having, within a calendar year, either: (i) at least two HIV-related physician visits/diagnostic tests or (ii) at least two antiretroviral therapy (ART) dispensations, ≥ 3 months apart. Individuals were followed until they were retained, died, their last contact date, or until 31 December 2011, whichever occurred first.

resultsOf 5231 linked individuals (78% male; median age 39: (Q1-Q3: 32-46) years], 4691 (90%) were retained [median time to initial retention of 9 (Q1-Q3: 5-13) months] by the end of follow-up and 540 (10%) were not. Eighty-four per cent of not retained and 96% of retained individuals used at least one type of NHRHS during follow-up. Individuals who saw a specialist for NHRHS during follow-up had a shorter time to initial retention than those who did not [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.47-3.16]. However, those who saw a general practitioner (GP) for NHRHS (aHR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.74-0.84) and those admitted to the hospital for NHRHS (aHR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.54-0.67), versus those who did/were not, respectively, had longer times to initial retention, as did female patients, people who inject drugs (PWID) and individuals < 40 years old.

conclusionsOverall, 84% of not retained individuals used some type of NHRHS during follow-up. Given that 71% of not retained individuals used GP NHRHS, our results suggest that GP-targeted interventions may be effective in improving time to initial retention.

Indexed as

AdultBritish ColumbiaFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareTime FactorsHIVmissed opportunitiesnon-HIV-related health care service utilizationretentionretention in HIV caretime to retention

Identifiers

PMID26216126
PMCPMC4691354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.