Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26215827›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2015

Abutilon indicum L.: a prospective weed for phytoremediation.

Mayank Varun, Disha Jaggi, Rohan D'Souza, Manoj S Paul, Bhumesh Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Invasive WeedInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mayank VarunDepartment of Botany, St. John's College, Agra, U.P., 282 002, India, 30mayank@gmail.com.
Disha Jaggi
Rohan D'Souza
Manoj S Paul
Bhumesh Kumar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was aimed to determine the uptake and accumulation potential of a weed (Abutilon indicum L.) for phytoremediation of soil contaminated with cadmium. Plants were grown in soil spiked with 0, 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 mg/kg Cd, individually. Plants sample (root and shoot) were analyzed for Cd content at 30, 60, and 90 days and accumulation trends were characterized. A steady increase in Cd accumulation with increasing metal concentration and exposure period was observed for all treatments. Accumulation of Cd in roots was found to be 4.3-7.7 times higher than that of shoots. Statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.001) in mean metal content in root and shoot at successive days of study was recorded. Effect of Cd on growth and physiology was also evaluated. At higher Cd levels, root and shoot length and biomass of test plant were reduced significantly. Although, growth was delayed initially, it was comparable to control at the end of the study. Chlorophyll and proline content declined with the increase in Cd concentration at 30 and 60 days after treatment. However, at 90 days, values were more or less comparable to the control values showing the adaptability of test plant in Cd contamination. Considering the accumulation ability, BCF >1 (bioconcentration factor) and TF <1 (translocation factor) established A. indicum as a potential candidate plant for phytoremediation. Hence, phytoremediation employing indigenous weed species like A. indicum can be an ecologically viable option for sustainable and cost-effective management of heavy metal-contaminated soils.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalBiomassCadmiumMalvaceaePlant RootsPlant ShootsPlant WeedsSoil PollutantsCadmiumSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.