Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26215211›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2016

Polypharmacy in Older Adults With Hypertension: A Comprehensive Review.

Bertrand N Mukete, Keith C Ferdinand

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence of Polypharmacy of Older People in a Large Brazilian Urban Center and its Associated Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Vascular frailty, a proposal for new frailty type: A narrative review.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Hypertension and Drug Adherence in the Elderly.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bertrand N MuketeTulane Heart and Vascular Institute/Section of Cardiology at Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Keith C FerdinandTulane Heart and Vascular Institute/Section of Cardiology at Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Tulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults are more likely to take more than two medications for medical conditions, and polypharmacy is associated with increased risk of adverse events (fall injury, hyperkalemia and hypokalemia, heart failure, and blood pressure exacerbation), polypharmacy mismanagement, drug-drug interaction, and increased costs. Knowledge of drugs that interact with known antihypertensive agents is paramount to avoiding or reducing adverse events, hospitalizations, and health care dollars. Innovative approaches such as use of a fixed-dose combination pill, ingestible sensor system, electronic reminder system, medical audits, and the integration of a pharmacist in the care of patients should be implemented to avoid polypharmacy mismanagement.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyAdultAgedAge FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID26215211
PMCPMC8031793
OpenAlexW1625405608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.