Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26215198›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2015

Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.

Jeffrey Landercasper, Deanna Attai, Dunya Atisha, Peter Beitsch, Linda Bosserman, Judy Boughey, Jodi Carter, Stephen Edge, Sheldon Feldman, Joshua Froman and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey LandercasperGundersen Health System Norma J. Vinger Center for Breast Care, La Crosse, WI, USA, jlanderc@gundersenhealth.org.
Deanna Attai
Dunya Atisha
Peter Beitsch
Linda Bosserman
Judy Boughey
Jodi Carter
Stephen Edge
Sheldon Feldman
Joshua Froman
Caprice Greenberg
Cary Kaufman
Monica Morrow
Barbara Pockaj
Melvin Silverstein
Lawrence Solin
Alicia Staley
Frank Vicini
Lee Wilke
Wei Yang
Hiram Cody
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US21st Century Oncology (United States) · USBaptist Memorial Health Care · USBellingham Technical College · USCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USCornell University · USDallas Surgical Group · USEinstein Healthcare Network · USGundersen Health System · USHoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California System · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple recent reports have documented significant variability of reoperation rates after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer. To address this issue, a multidisciplinary consensus conference was convened during the American Society of Breast Surgeons 2015 annual meeting.

methodsThe conference mission statement was to "reduce the national reoperation rate in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery for cancer, without increasing mastectomy rates or adversely affecting cosmetic outcome, thereby improving value of care." The goal was to develop a toolbox of recommendations to reduce the variability of reoperation rates and improve cosmetic outcomes. Conference participants included providers from multiple disciplines involved with breast cancer care, as well as a patient representative. Updated systematic reviews of the literature and invited presentations were sent to participants in advance. After topic presentations, voting occurred for choice of tools, level of evidence, and strength of recommendation.

resultsThe following tools were recommended with varied levels of evidence and strength of recommendation: compliance with the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guideline; needle biopsy for diagnosis before surgical excision of breast cancer; full-field digital diagnostic mammography with ultrasound as needed; use of oncoplastic techniques; image-guided lesion localization; specimen imaging for nonpalpable cancers; use of specialized techniques for intraoperative management, including excisional cavity shave biopsies and intraoperative pathology assessment; formal pre- and postoperative planning strategies; and patient-reported outcome measurement.

conclusionsA practical approach to performance improvement was used by the American Society of Breast Surgeons to create a toolbox of options to reduce lumpectomy reoperations and improve cosmetic outcomes.

Indexed as

MammaplastyReoperationBreast NeoplasmsCongresses as TopicFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm StagingPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiation OncologySocieties, MedicalSurgeons

Identifiers

PMID26215198
PMCPMC4550635
OpenAlexW1921052406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.