ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2015
Complement factor H R1210C among Japanese patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dimethyl Fumarate Protects Retinal Pigment Epithelium from Blue Light-Induced Oxidative Damage via the Nrf2 Pathway.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Review
- Hypothetical pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration and pachychoroid diseases derived from their genetic characteristics.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2020Review
- Geographic distribution of rare variants associated with age-related macular degeneration.Molecular vision · 2018Article
- The complement system in age-related macular degeneration: A review of rare genetic variants and implications for personalized treatment.Molecular immunology · 2017Review
- Nuclear Factor (Erythroid-Derived)-Related Factor 2-Associated Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cell Protection under Blue Light-Induced Oxidative Stress.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the genotype distribution of a rare age-related macular degeneration (AMD)-susceptibility variant, complement factor H (CFH) R1210C, among a large Japanese cohort with AMD.
methodsOne thousand three hundred and sixty-four Japanese patients with neovascular AMD were evaluated. We screened for CFH R1210C (rs121913059) by genotyping with the Taqman method; the mutation was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. We also searched for this mutation in the human genome variant database, which contains the whole-exome sequencing data for 1208 Japanese individuals. The detailed characteristics of patients with this mutation were reviewed.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 74.5 years (standard deviation 8.7); men accounted for 71.8 % of the patients. The CFH R1210C variant was found in only 1 of the 1364 AMD patients, and was heterozygous (minor allele frequency (MAF) = 0.037 %); it was not found in any of the 1208 individuals in the control group (MAF = 0 %). The patient with CFH R1210C was a 70-year-old woman whose main complaint was visual loss in the right eye. Dilated fundus examination, optical coherence tomography, and fluorescein and indocyanine angiography revealed polypoidal choroidal neovasculopathy (PCV), but no drusen in either eye. Despite treatment, her visual acuity had decreased to 1/50 by 6.8 years after her first visit.
conclusionsThe CFH R1210C variant was found to be rare among Japanese patients with AMD. The patient with the mutation did have the PCV subtype, but no drusen formation. Considering their ethnicity-specific nature, such rare variants should be studied by use of next-generation sequencing for each ethnicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.