ArticleDer Nervenarzt2015
[High resolution manometry study of pharyngeal function in patients with myotonic dystrophy].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of current methodology of high resolution pharyngeal manometry with and without impedance.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnosis and treatment of neurogenic dysphagia - S1 guideline of the German Society of Neurology.Neurological research and practice · 2021Article
- Combined achalasia and cricopharyngeal achalasia in a patient with type 1 myotonic dystrophy: a case report.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with myotonic dystrophy (MD) are known to suffer from oropharyngeal dysphagia and esophageal motility disorders, which are often the cause of aspiration pneumonia. So far only little is known about the pharyngeal contractility and the function of the upper esophageal sphincter in these patients, in particular only few data are available for manometric investigations allowing assessment of the pharyngeal pressure build-up during swallowing. The aim of this study was to collect such data in patients with MD using high resolution manometry.
methodIn two patients with MD high resolution manometry studies were performed during swallowing and phonation to determine pressure-dependent parameters. The results were compared with normal values from healthy subjects.
resultsIn both patients a reduced pressure in the entire pharynx during swallowing was determined. The duration of the contraction in the velopharynx and tongue base region was shortened. The structural course of the swallowing process and the opening and closing functions of the upper esophageal sphincter were regular. During realization of closed vowels a reduced pressure build-up in the velopharyngeal region was observed.
conclusionThe force of contraction and the associated pharyngeal pressure build-up during swallowing were reduced resulting in an incomplete clearing of the pharynx. Beside myopathic disorders, neuromuscular disorders also have to be considered. The functional course of the swallowing process and the swallowing pattern was retained. The reduced pressure build-up in the velopharyngeal region can be considered as the cause for rhinophonia. To evaluate the pharyngeal function in patients with MD, high resolution manometry is a useful tool for assessing the pharyngeal function besides the basic diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.