Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26214178›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Calibration and Validation of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Pain Interference Item Bank in Patients with Chronic Pain.

Martine H P Crins, Leo D Roorda, Niels Smits, Henrica C W de Vet, Rene Westhovens, David Cella, Karon F Cook, Dennis Revicki, Jaap van Leeuwen, Maarten Boers and 2 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Measuring PROMIS pain interference in German patients with chronic conditions: calibration, validation, and cross-cultural use of item parameters.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  8. Measurement properties of the Dutch PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile in people with and without chronic conditions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  9. Psychometric properties of the PROMIS-57 questionnaire, Norwegian version.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Validation of two PROMIS item banks for measuring social participation in the Dutch general population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  19. Measurement invariance and general population reference values of the PROMIS Profile 29 in the UK, France, and Germany.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martine H P CrinsAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Leo D RoordaAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels SmitsDepartment of Clinical Psychology, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Methodology, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henrica C W de VetDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rene WesthovensDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium; Rheumatology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
David CellaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Karon F CookDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Dennis RevickiOutcomes Research, Evidera, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Jaap van LeeuwenLeones Group BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten BoersDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joost DekkerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline B TerweeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Group translated the adult PROMIS Pain Interference item bank into Dutch-Flemish. The aims of the current study were to calibrate the parameters of these items using an item response theory (IRT) model, to evaluate the cross-cultural validity of the Dutch-Flemish translations compared to the original English items, and to evaluate their reliability and construct validity. The 40 items in the bank were completed by 1085 Dutch chronic pain patients. Before calibrating the items, IRT model assumptions were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Items were calibrated using the graded response model (GRM), an IRT model appropriate for items with more than two response options. To evaluate cross-cultural validity, differential item functioning (DIF) for language (Dutch vs. English) was examined. Reliability was evaluated based on standard errors and Cronbach's alpha. To evaluate construct validity correlations with scores on legacy instruments (e.g., the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire) were calculated. Unidimensionality of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Pain Interference item bank was supported by CFA tests of model fit (CFI = 0.986, TLI = 0.986). Furthermore, the data fit the GRM and showed good coverage across the pain interference continuum (threshold-parameters range: -3.04 to 3.44). The Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Pain Interference item bank has good cross-cultural validity (only two out of 40 items showing DIF), good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98), and good construct validity (Pearson correlations between 0.62 and 0.75). A computer adaptive test (CAT) and Dutch-Flemish PROMIS short forms of the Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Pain Interference item bank can now be developed.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementAdultBelgiumCalibrationDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID26214178
PMCPMC4516300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.