Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26214005›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Different Stability and Proteasome-Mediated Degradation Rate of SMN Protein Isoforms.

Denise Locatelli, Mineko Terao, Mami Kurosaki, Maria Clara Zanellati, Daniela Rita Pletto, Adele Finardi, Francesca Colciaghi, Enrico Garattini, Giorgio Stefano Battaglia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denise LocatelliMolecular Neuroanatomy and Pathogenesis Unit, IRCCS Neurological Institute "C. Besta", Milano, Italy.
Mineko TeraoLaboratory of Molecular Biology, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milano, Italy.
Mami KurosakiLaboratory of Molecular Biology, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milano, Italy.
Maria Clara ZanellatiMolecular Neuroanatomy and Pathogenesis Unit, IRCCS Neurological Institute "C. Besta", Milano, Italy.
Daniela Rita PlettoMolecular Neuroanatomy and Pathogenesis Unit, IRCCS Neurological Institute "C. Besta", Milano, Italy.
Adele FinardiMolecular Neuroanatomy and Pathogenesis Unit, IRCCS Neurological Institute "C. Besta", Milano, Italy.
Francesca ColciaghiMolecular Neuroanatomy and Pathogenesis Unit, IRCCS Neurological Institute "C. Besta", Milano, Italy.
Enrico GarattiniLaboratory of Molecular Biology, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milano, Italy.
Giorgio Stefano BattagliaMolecular Neuroanatomy and Pathogenesis Unit, IRCCS Neurological Institute "C. Besta", Milano, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · IT

Funding

Telethon GGP13081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The key pathogenic steps leading to spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a genetic disease characterized by selective motor neuron degeneration, are not fully clarified. The full-length SMN protein (FL-SMN), the main protein product of the disease gene SMN1, plays an established role in the cytoplasm in snRNP biogenesis ultimately leading to mRNA splicing within the nucleus. It is also involved in the mRNA axonal transport. However, to what extent the impairment of these two SMN functions contributes to SMA pathogenesis remains unknown. A shorter SMN isoform, axonal-SMN or a-SMN, with more specific axonal localization, has been discovered, but whether it might act in concert with FL-SMN in SMA pathogenesis is not known. As a first step in defining common or divergent intracellular roles of FL-SMN vs a-SMN proteins, we here characterized the turn-over of both proteins and investigated which pathway contributed to a-SMN degradation. We performed real time western blot and confocal immunofluorescence analysis in easily controllable in vitro settings. We analyzed co-transfected NSC34 and HeLa cells and cell clones stably expressing both a-SMN and FL-SMN proteins after specific blocking of transcript or protein synthesis and inhibition of known intracellular degradation pathways. Our data indicated that whereas the stability of both FL-SMN and a-SMN transcripts was comparable, the a-SMN protein was characterized by a much shorter half-life than FL-SMN. In addition, as already demonstrated for FL-SMN, the Ub/proteasome pathway played a major role in the a-SMN protein degradation. We hypothesize that the faster degradation rate of a-SMN vs FL-SMN is related to the protection provided by the protein complex in which FL-SMN is assembled. The diverse a-SMN vs FL-SMN C-terminus may dictate different protein interactions and complex formation explaining the different localization and role in the neuronal compartment, and the lower expression and stability of a-SMN.

Indexed as

Protein StabilityProteolysisCell LineHumansMuscular Atrophy, SpinalProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein IsoformsProtein Structure, TertiarySurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinUbiquitinProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein IsoformsSMN1 protein, humanSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID26214005
PMCPMC4516248
OpenAlexW968535857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.