Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26213564›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2015

Prediction of mortality in patients with colorectal perforation based on routinely available parameters: a retrospective study.

Takehito Yamamoto, Ryosuke Kita, Hideyuki Masui, Hiromitsu Kinoshita, Yusuke Sakamoto, Kazuyuki Okada, Junji Komori, Akira Miki, Kenji Uryuhara, Hiroyuki Kobayashi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perforated Colorectal Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Postoperative recurrence and risk factors of colorectal cancer perforation.International journal of colorectal disease · 2017
    Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Takehito YamamotoDepartment of Surgery, Kitano Hospital, The Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, 2-4-20 Ogimachi, Kita-ku, Osaka, 530-8480 Japan.
Ryosuke KitaKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Hideyuki MasuiKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Hiromitsu KinoshitaKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Yusuke SakamotoKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Kazuyuki OkadaKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Junji KomoriKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Akira MikiKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Kenji UryuharaKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Hiroyuki KobayashiKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Hiroki HashidaKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Satoshi KaiharaKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.
Ryo HosotaniKobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-Minamimachi, Chuoku, Kobe 650-0047 Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEven after surgery and intensive postoperative management, the mortality rate associated with colorectal perforation is high. Identification of mortality markers using routinely available preoperative parameters is important.

methodsWe enrolled consecutive patients with colorectal perforation who underwent operations from January 2010 to January 2015. We divided them into a mortality and survivor group and compared clinical characteristics between the two groups. Additionally, we compared the mortality rate between different etiologies: malignant versus benign and diverticular versus nondiverticular. We used the χ (2) and Mann-Whitney U tests and a logistic regression model to identify factors associated with mortality.

resultsWe enrolled 108 patients, and 52 (48 %) were male. The mean age at surgery was 71 ± 13 years. The postoperative mortality rate was 12 % (13 patients). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a high patient age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.020-1.181) and low preoperative systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.953-0.999) were independent risk factors for mortality in patients with colorectal perforation. In the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference between the malignant and benign group (11.8 % vs. 23.9 %, respectively; p = 0.970), while the diverticular group had a significantly lower mortality rate than the nondiverticular group (2.6 % vs. 17.1 %, respectively; p = 0.027).

conclusionsOlder patients and patients with low preoperative blood pressure had a high risk of mortality associated with colorectal perforation. For such patients, operations and postoperative management should be performed carefully.

Indexed as

Colorectal perforationMortality markerPrognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID26213564
PMCPMC4513392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.