Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26213527›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental criminology2015

Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Randomized Evaluation of Communities That Care: Monetizing Intervention Effects on the Initiation of Delinquency and Substance Use Through Grade 12.

Margaret R Kuklinski, Abigail A Fagan, J David Hawkins, John S Briney, Richard F Catalano

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental criminology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01088542 (The Interplay of Social, Normative, and Legal Marijuana Environments and Marijuana and ATOD Use From Late Childhood to Young Adulthood), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01088542 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Interplay of Social, Normative, and Legal Marijuana Environments and Marijuana and ATOD Use From Late Childhood to Young Adulthood

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2003 to 2025Enrolled52,323ConditionsSubstance Abuse, Juvenile Delinquency, Sexual Behavior, Criminal BehaviorArmsCommunities That Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Long-term Impacts and Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Communities That Care Prevention System at Age 23, 12 Years After Baseline.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Trial
  5. A Cluster-Randomized Trial of Getting To Outcomes' Impact on Sexual Health Outcomes in Community-Based Settings.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Kindergarten conduct problems are associated with monetized outcomes in adolescence and adulthood.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Economic Evaluation of the Juvenile Drug Court/Reclaiming Futures (JDC/RF) Model.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret R KuklinskiSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington.
Abigail A FaganDepartment of Criminology, Sociology, and Law, University of Florida.
J David HawkinsSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington.
John S BrineySocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington.
Richard F CatalanoSocial Development Research Group, School of Social Work, University of Washington.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

The Community Youth Development Study: A Test of Communities That CareR01DA015183 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HAWKINS, J DAVID, OESTERLE, SABRINA · 2003 to 2016
$34.0M
Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TOLNAY, STEWART E · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system is a cost-beneficial intervention.

methodsData were from a longitudinal panel of 4,407 youth participating in a randomized controlled trial including 24 towns in 7 states, matched in pairs within state and randomly assigned to condition. Significant differences favoring intervention youth in sustained abstinence from delinquency, alcohol use, and tobacco use through Grade 12 were monetized and compared to economic investment in CTC.

resultsCTC was estimated to produce $4,477 in benefits per youth (discounted 2011 dollars). It cost $556 per youth to implement CTC for 5 years. The net present benefit was $3,920. The benefit-cost ratio was $8.22 per dollar invested. The internal rate of return was 21%. Risk that investment would exceed benefits was minimal. Investment was expected to be recouped within 9 years. Sensitivity analyses in which effects were halved yielded positive cost-beneficial results.

conclusionsCTC is a cost-beneficial, community-based approach to preventing initiation of delinquency, alcohol use, and tobacco use. CTC is estimated to generate economic benefits that exceed implementation costs when disseminated with fidelity in communities.

Indexed as

Benefit-Cost AnalysisCommunities That CareDelinquency PreventionSubstance Use PreventionYouth Development

Identifiers

PMID26213527
PMCPMC4512954
OpenAlexW2038078123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.