ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2015
Mentoring and Training of Cancer-Related Health Disparities Researchers Committed to Community-Based Participatory Research.
Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences of International and Puerto Rican Medical Graduates in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- A scaffolded training series to develop Clinical and Translational Researchers in Hawai'i.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2025Article
- Impact of Gender and Underrepresented in Medicine Status on Research Productivity Among Ophthalmology Residency Applicants.American journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Mentoring New and Early-Stage Investigators and Underrepresented Minority Faculty for Research Success in Health-Related Fields: An Integrative Literature Review (2010-2020).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Building capacity for community-based participatory research to address cancer disparities: Case report from a Community Networks Program Center.Evaluation and program planning · 2020Article
- Mentoring, Training, and Scholarly Productivity Experiences of Cancer-Related Health Disparities Research Trainees: Do Outcomes Differ for Underrepresented Scientists?Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019Article
- Comprehensive strategy for capturing and integrating community input into community research training curricula.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- Early-Stage Investigators and Institutional Interface: Importance of Organization in the Mentoring Culture of Today's Universities.AIDS and behavior · 2016Article
- Community-Based Participatory Research Adds Value to the National Cancer Institute's Research Portfolio.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015Article
- A Legacy of Science and Community Engagement via the Community Networks Program.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015Article
- Accelerating Research Collaborations Between Academia and Federally Qualified Health Centers: Suggestions Shaped by History.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Community Networks Program Centers (CNPCs) provide community-based participatory research (CBPR)-oriented mentoring and training to prepare early-stage/midcareer investigators and student trainees (trainees) in disparities reduction. This paper describes the academic, mentoring, training, and work-life balance experiences of CNPC-affiliated trainees.
methodsWe used a collaborative and iterative process to develop a 57-item, web-based questionnaire completed by trainees from the 23 CNPCs between August 2012 and February 2013. Their CNPC mentors completed a 47-item questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were calculated.
resultsThe final analytic sample included 189 of 269 individuals (70%) identified as active participants in CNPC research or training/mentoring. Mentors (n=45) were mostly non-Hispanic White (77.8%) and 48.9% were male. Mentors published a median of 6 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-12) first-authored and 15 (IQR, 6-25) senior authored manuscripts, and secured 15 (IQR, 11-29) grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other sources in the previous 5 years. Most trainees (n=144) were female (79.2%), 43.7% were underrepresented racial/ethnic minorities, and 36.8% were first-generation college graduates. Over the previous 5 years, trainees reported a median of 4 (IQR, 1-6) publications as first author and 4 (IQR, 2-8) as co-author; 27.1% reported having one or more NIH R01s. Trainees reported satisfaction with their CNPC mentor (79.1%) and confidence in demonstrating most CBPR competencies.
conclusionThe CNPC training program consists of a scientifically productive pool of mentors and trainees. Trainees reported rates of scholarly productivity comparable to other national training programs and provided insights into relationships with mentors, academic pressures, and professional-personal life balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.