Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26213404›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2015

Introducing Biospecimen Science to Communities: Tools from Two Cities.

Cathy D Meade, Elisa M Rodriguez, Mariana Arevalo, John S Luque, Narseary Harris, Gloria San Miguel, Clement K Gwede, Deborah O Erwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Educating Hispanics About Clinical Trials and Biobanking.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Community-Based Participatory Research Adds Value to the National Cancer Institute's Research Portfolio.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015
    Article
  8. A Legacy of Science and Community Engagement via the Community Networks Program.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cathy D Meade
Elisa M Rodriguez
Mariana Arevalo
John S Luque
Narseary Harris
Gloria San Miguel
Clement K Gwede
Deborah O Erwin

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Western New York Cancer Coalition (WNYC2) Center to Reduce DisparitiesU54CA153598 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ERWIN, DEBORAH O, UNDERWOOD, WILLIE · 2010 to 2015
$4.8M
Training ProgramU54CA153509 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GWEDE, CLEMENT K., MEADE, CATHY D. · 2010 to 2015
$4.8M
Tampa Bay Community Cancer Network (TB-CCN): A Model fo*U01CA114627 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI MEADE, CATHY D. · 2005 to 2009
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS U01 CA114627NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153509NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article describes community-engaged processes employed by two Community Network Program Center (CNPC) sites located in Tampa, Florida, and Buffalo, New York, toward the development of Spanish/English educational products about biobanking and biospecimen research.

methodsEach CNPC carried out a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach that underscored six essential components that moved concepts to a final educational product in a highly participatory fashion. The similar CBPR processes at the two locations focused on the same topic, resulted in different engagement approaches and tools for their respective communities: 1) DVD and brochure toolkit and 2) PowerPoint, group program with audience response system (ARS).

resultsWe detail a comparison of methods and applications for using these tools among diverse community groups to advance understandings about genetic and biomedical research technologies.

conclusionUltimately, these tools and associated educational efforts emphasize the critical value of co-learning among academic and community members in biobanking and biospecimen research.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity NetworksHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMinority GroupsNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsRacial GroupsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26213404
PMCPMC4834706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.