Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26213403›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2015

Fulfilling Ethical Responsibility: Moving Beyond the Minimal Standards of Protecting Human Subjects from Research Harm.

James R Hébert, William A Satariano, Daniela B Friedman, Cheryl A Armstead, Allen Greiner, Tisha M Felder, Thomas A Coggins, Sora Tanjasiri, Kathryn L Braun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Personal Touch: The Most Important Strategy for Recruiting Latino Research Participants.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Community-Based Participatory Research Adds Value to the National Cancer Institute's Research Portfolio.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015
    Article
  10. A Legacy of Science and Community Engagement via the Community Networks Program.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James R Hébert
William A Satariano
Daniela B Friedman
Cheryl A Armstead
Allen Greiner
Tisha M Felder
Thomas A Coggins
Sora Tanjasiri
Kathryn L Braun

Funding

RESEARCH DESIGN AND BIOSTATISTICS COREU54MD007584 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI MOKUAU, NOREEN, SHIRAMIZU, BRUCE T · 2012 to 2018
$21.1M
Training ProgramU54CA153461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2010 to 2015
$4.8M
Training ProgramU54CA154253 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GREINER, K ALLEN · 2010 to 2015
$4.6M
Training ProgramU54CA153459 · NCI · PAPA OLA LOKAHI · PI BRAUN, KATHRYN LENZNER · 2010 to 2015
$4.5M
Training ProgramU54CA153506 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BLOOM, JOAN R, SATARIANO, WILLIAM ANTHONY · 2010 to 2015
$4.3M
Expanding Mentoring Capacity in High-Risk PopulationsK05CA136975 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI HEBERT, JAMES R · 2009 to 2013
$801k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA136975NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153459NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153461NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153506NCI NIH HHS U54 CA154253NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemRules for protecting human subjects, in place federally since 1974, have focused primarily on guarding against placing research subjects at social, physical, or psychological risk or violating their privacy and confidentiality. Nevertheless, high-risk communities are routinely subjected to "sins of omission," which limit access to potentially significant research opportunities and result in the absence of studies that could confer high degree of community beneficence. PURPOSE OF ARTICLE: To describe "sins of omission" and provide examples from the Community Networks Program Centers (CNPC) to illustrate how community-based participatory research (CBPR) can prevent them. KEY POINTS: CBPR is an effective antidote to sins of omission. Activities undertaken by the CNPCs illustrate how adherence to CBPR principles can improve research access and outcomes.

conclusionsBy working with community members as partners, we expand the concept of beneficence to include "community beneficence," thus reducing the probability of "sins of omission."

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchResearch SubjectsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity NetworksHumansMinority GroupsNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsRacial GroupsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26213403
PMCPMC4659710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.