Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26213333›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2015

Progression from severe sepsis in pregnancy to death: a UK population-based case-control analysis.

O Mohamed-Ahmed, M Nair, C Acosta, J J Kurinczuk, M Knight

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Severe Maternal Morbidity Among Adolescents Aged 10-19 in California, 2001-2020.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Reducing post-cesarean sepsis: Current best practice in prevention and treatment.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How should we interpret lactate in labour? A reference study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Progression from severe sepsis in pregnancy to death: a UK population-based case-control analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

O Mohamed-AhmedNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
M NairNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
C AcostaNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J J KurinczukNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
M KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-032Department of Health RP-PG-0608-10038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify factors associated with progression from pregnancy-associated severe sepsis to death in the UK.

designA population-based case-control analysis using data from the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS) and the UK Confidential Enquiry into Maternal Death (CEMD).

settingAll pregnancy care and death settings in UK hospitals. POPULATION: All non-influenza sepsis-related maternal deaths (January 2009 to December 2012) were included as cases (n = 43), and all women who survived severe non-influenza sepsis in pregnancy (June 2011 to May 2012) were included as controls (n = 358).

methodsCases and controls were identified using the CEMD and UKOSS. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals.

main outcome measuresOdds ratios for socio-demographic, medical, obstetric and management factors in women who died from sepsis, compared with those who survived.

resultsFour factors were included in the final regression model. Women who died were more likely to have never received antibiotics [aOR = 22.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.64-141.6], to have medical comorbidities (aOR = 2.53, 95%CI 1.23-5.23) and to be multiparous (aOR = 3.57, 95%CI 1.62-7.89). Anaemia (aOR = 13.5, 95%CI 3.17-57.6) and immunosuppression (aOR = 15.0, 95%CI 1.93-116.9) were the two most important factors driving the association between medical comorbidities and progression to death.

conclusionsThere must be continued vigilance for the risks of infection in pregnant women with medical comorbidities. Improved adherence to national guidelines, alongside prompt recognition and treatment with antibiotics, may reduce the burden from sepsis-related maternal deaths. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Medical comorbidities, multiparity and antibiotic delays increase the risk of death from maternal sepsis.

Indexed as

AnemiaAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase-Control StudiesComorbidityDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostMultivariate AnalysisParityPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRisk FactorsSepsisTime-to-TreatmentAnti-Bacterial AgentsMaternal deathsmaternal sepsispregnancyseptic shocksevere acute maternal morbiditysevere sepsis

Identifiers

PMID26213333
PMCPMC5008196
OpenAlexW1510179964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.