Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26213329›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Genetic, molecular and physiological basis of variation in Drosophila gut immunocompetence.

Maroun S Bou Sleiman, Dani Osman, Andreas Massouras, Ary A Hoffmann, Bruno Lemaitre, Bart Deplancke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Sex differences inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Evidence that injury can causebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Standard ingredient ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Adaptation to a bacterial pathogen inEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maroun S Bou Sleiman1] Global Health Institute, School of Life Sciences, Station 19, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Station 19, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Dani OsmanGlobal Health Institute, School of Life Sciences, Station 19, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andreas MassourasInstitute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Station 19, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ary A HoffmannSchool of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Bruno LemaitreGlobal Health Institute, School of Life Sciences, Station 19, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bart Deplancke1] Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Station 19, EPFL, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland [2] Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD018537NIH HHS P40OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut immunocompetence involves immune, stress and regenerative processes. To investigate the determinants underlying inter-individual variation in gut immunocompetence, we perform enteric infection of 140 Drosophila lines with the entomopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas entomophila and observe extensive variation in survival. Using genome-wide association analysis, we identify several novel immune modulators. Transcriptional profiling further shows that the intestinal molecular state differs between resistant and susceptible lines, already before infection, with one transcriptional module involving genes linked to reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism contributing to this difference. This genetic and molecular variation is physiologically manifested in lower ROS activity, lower susceptibility to ROS-inducing agent, faster pathogen clearance and higher stem cell activity in resistant versus susceptible lines. This study provides novel insights into the determinants underlying population-level variability in gut immunocompetence, revealing how relatively minor, but systematic genetic and transcriptional variation can mediate overt physiological differences that determine enteric infection susceptibility.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial LoadDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenome-Wide Association StudyImmunocompetenceIntestinal MucosaIntestinesPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePseudomonasPseudomonas InfectionsReactive Oxygen SpeciesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, RNADrosophila ProteinsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID26213329
PMCPMC4525169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.