Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26213283›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Doubling Throughput of a Real-Time PCR.

Christian D Ahrberg, Pavel Neužil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanisms, Techniques and Devices of Airborne Virus Detection: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Handheld real-time PCR device.Lab on a chip · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian D AhrbergKist-Europe, Saarbrücken, Saarland, 66123, Germany.
Pavel Neužil1] Kist-Europe, Saarbrücken, Saarland, 66123, Germany [2] Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technická 3058/10, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic [3] Northwestern Polytechnical University, School of Mechanical Engineering, 127 West Youyi Road, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710072, P.R.China.
KIST Europe · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invention of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 1983 revolutionized many areas of science, due to its ability to multiply a number of copies of DNA sequences (known as amplicons). Here we report on a method to double the throughput of quantitative PCR which could be especially useful for PCR-based mass screening. We concurrently amplified two target genes using only single fluorescent dye. A FAM probe labelled olionucleotide was attached to a quencher for one amplicon while the second one was without a probe. The PCR was performed in the presence of the intercalating dye SYBR Green I. We collected the fluorescence amplitude at two points per PCR cycle, at the denaturation and extension steps. The signal at denaturation is related only to the amplicon with the FAM probe while the amplitude at the extension contained information from both amplicons. We thus detected two genes within the same well using a single fluorescent channel. Any commercial real-time PCR systems can use this method doubling the number of detected genes. The method can be used for absolute quantification of DNA using a known concentration of housekeeping gene at one fluorescent channel.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSpectrometry, FluorescenceFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID26213283
PMCPMC4515875
OpenAlexW2268988268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.