Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26212482›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

VaccineDA: Prediction, design and genome-wide screening of oligodeoxynucleotide-based vaccine adjuvants.

Gandharva Nagpal, Sudheer Gupta, Kumardeep Chaudhary, Sandeep Kumar Dhanda, Satya Prakash, Gajendra P S Raghava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial Intelligence in Vaccine and Drug Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. PRRDB 2.0: a comprehensive database of pattern-recognition receptors and their ligands.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mucosal adjuvants: Opportunities and challenges.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gandharva NagpalBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh-160036, INDIA.
Sudheer GuptaBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh-160036, INDIA.
Kumardeep ChaudharyBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh-160036, INDIA.
Sandeep Kumar DhandaBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh-160036, INDIA.
Satya PrakashBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh-160036, INDIA.
Gajendra P S RaghavaBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh-160036, INDIA.
Institute of Microbial Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunomodulatory oligodeoxynucleotides (IMODNs) are the short DNA sequences that activate the innate immune system via toll-like receptor 9. These sequences predominantly contain unmethylated CpG motifs. In this work, we describe VaccineDA (Vaccine DNA adjuvants), a web-based resource developed to design IMODN-based vaccine adjuvants. We collected and analyzed 2193 experimentally validated IMODNs obtained from the literature. Certain types of nucleotides (e.g., T, GT, TC, TT, CGT, TCG, TTT) are dominant in IMODNs. Based on these observations, we developed support vector machine-based models to predict IMODNs using various compositions. The developed models achieved the maximum Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.75 with an accuracy of 87.57% using the pentanucleotide composition. The integration of motif information further improved the performance of our model from the MCC of 0.75 to 0.77. Similarly, models were developed to predict palindromic IMODNs and attained a maximum MCC of 0.84 with the accuracy of 91.94%. These models were evaluated using a five-fold cross-validation technique as well as validated on an independent dataset. The models developed in this study were integrated into VaccineDA to provide a wide range of services that facilitate the design of DNA-based vaccine adjuvants (http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/vaccineda/).

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsBase SequenceChromosome MappingDrug DesignDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansInternetMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNAToll-Like Receptor 9Vaccines, DNAToll-Like Receptor 9Vaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26212482
PMCPMC4515643
OpenAlexW948755859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.