Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26212396›Full record

Observational studyArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2015

Traumatic Brain Injury-Practice Based Evidence Study: Design and Patients, Centers, Treatments, and Outcomes.

Susan D Horn, John D Corrigan, Jennifer Bogner, Flora M Hammond, Ronald T Seel, Randall J Smout, Ryan S Barrett, Marcel P Dijkers, Gale G Whiteneck

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcome Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Research Design Options for Intervention Studies.Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susan D HornInstitute for Clinical Outcomes Research, International Severity Information Systems, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: susan.horn@hsc.utah.edu.
John D CorriganDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Jennifer BognerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Flora M HammondCarolinas Rehabilitation, Charlotte, NC; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Ronald T SeelCrawford Research Institute, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA.
Randall J SmoutInstitute for Clinical Outcomes Research, International Severity Information Systems, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT.
Ryan S BarrettInstitute for Clinical Outcomes Research, International Severity Information Systems, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT.
Marcel P DijkersDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Gale G WhiteneckResearch Department, Craig Hospital, Englewood, CO.

Funding

Improving Outcomes in Acute Rehabilitation for TBIR01HD050439 · NICHD · INTERNATIONAL SEVERITY INFO SYSTEMS,INC. · PI HORN, SUSAN D · 2007 to 2011
$3.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD050439NICHD NIH HHS R01HD050439-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe study design, patients, centers, treatments, and outcomes of a traumatic brain injury (TBI) practice-based evidence (PBE) study and to evaluate the generalizability of the findings to the U.S. TBI inpatient rehabilitation population.

designProspective, longitudinal, observational study.

settingTen inpatient rehabilitation centers.

participantsPatients (N=2130) enrolled between October 2008 and September 2011 and admitted for inpatient rehabilitation after an index TBI injury.

interventionsNot applicable.

main outcome measuresReturn to acute care during rehabilitation, rehabilitation length of stay, FIM at discharge, residence at discharge, and 9 months postdischarge rehospitalization, FIM, participation, and subjective well-being.

resultsThe level of admission FIM cognitive score was found to create relatively homogeneous subgroups for the subsequent analysis of best treatment combinations. There were significant differences in patient and injury characteristics, treatments, rehabilitation course, and outcomes by admission FIM cognitive subgroups. TBI-PBE study patients were overall similar to U.S. national TBI inpatient rehabilitation populations.

conclusionsThis TBI-PBE study succeeded in capturing naturally occurring variation in patients and treatments, offering opportunities to study best treatments for specific patient impairments. Subsequent articles in this issue report differences between patients and treatments and associations with outcomes in greater detail.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionBrain InjuriesEducational StatusEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansLength of StayLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOccupational TherapyPoint-of-Care SystemsBrain injuriesComparative effectiveness researchRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID26212396
PMCPMC4516907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.