Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26212391›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of surgery2015

Heart rate variability analysis is more sensitive at identifying neonatal sepsis than conventional vital signs.

Fredrick J Bohanon, Amy A Mrazek, Mohamed T Shabana, Sarah Mims, Geetha L Radhakrishnan, George C Kramer, Ravi S Radhakrishnan

Abstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Baseline NIPEEuropean journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Feeding intolerance.Early human development · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A narrative review of heart rate and variability in sepsis.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fredrick J BohanonDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Amy A MrazekDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Mohamed T ShabanaDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Sarah MimsDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Geetha L RadhakrishnanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
George C KramerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Ravi S RadhakrishnanDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA. Electronic address: rsradhak@utmb.edu.

Funding

POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN TRAUMA &BURNST32GM008256 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI Celeste Campbell Finnerty, Oscar E. Suman-Vejas · 1990 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008256NIGMS NIH HHS T32-GM8256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis remains the largest preventable source of neonatal mortality in the world. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis and noninvasive cardiac output have been shown to be useful adjuncts to sepsis detection in many patient groups.

methodsWith Institutional Review Board approval, 4 septic and 6 nonseptic extremely low birth weight patients were enrolled. Data from septic and healthy patients were collected for 5 hours. Electrocardiogram waveform and traditional vital signs were collected and the RR intervals were calculated; then HRV analysis was performed in both the time and frequency domain.

resultsHRV measurements in time domain, heart rate, and pulse oximetry (SpO2) were significantly different in septic patients vs nonseptic controls.

conclusionsThese results indicate that nonconventional vital signs such as HRV are more sensitive than traditionally used vital signs, such as cardiac output and mean arterial pressure, in the confirmation of sepsis in extremely low birth weight neonates. HRV may allow for earlier identification of septic physiology.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesMaleOximetrySensitivity and SpecificitySepsisHeart rate variabilityNeonatalNoninvasive vital signsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID26212391
PMCPMC4575854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.