Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26212360›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Computational Classification Approach to Profile Neuron Subtypes from Brain Activity Mapping Data.

Meng Li, Fang Zhao, Jason Lee, Dong Wang, Hui Kuang, Joe Z Tsien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mining Big Neuron Morphological Data.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meng LiBrain and Behavior Discovery Institute and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Fang ZhaoBrain and Behavior Discovery Institute and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Jason LeeBrain and Behavior Discovery Institute and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Dong WangBrain and Behavior Discovery Institute and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
Hui Kuang1] Brain and Behavior Discovery Institute and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA [2] The Brain Decoding Center, Banna Biomedical Research Institute, Xi-Shuang-Ban-Na Prefecture, Yunnan Province 666100, China.
Joe Z Tsien1] Brain and Behavior Discovery Institute and Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA [2] The Brain Decoding Center, Banna Biomedical Research Institute, Xi-Shuang-Ban-Na Prefecture, Yunnan Province 666100, China.

Funding

Molecular and Temporal Dissection of Habit LearningR01NS079774 · NINDS · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI TSIEN, JOE Z · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS NS079774NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS079774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of cell type-specific activity patterns during behaviors is important for better understanding of how neural circuits generate cognition, but has not been well explored from in vivo neurophysiological datasets. Here, we describe a computational approach to uncover distinct cell subpopulations from in vivo neural spike datasets. This method, termed "inter-spike-interval classification-analysis" (ISICA), is comprised of four major steps: spike pattern feature-extraction, pre-clustering analysis, clustering classification, and unbiased classification-dimensionality selection. By using two key features of spike dynamic - namely, gamma distribution shape factors and a coefficient of variation of inter-spike interval - we show that this ISICA method provides invariant classification for dopaminergic neurons or CA1 pyramidal cell subtypes regardless of the brain states from which spike data were collected. Moreover, we show that these ISICA-classified neuron subtypes underlie distinct physiological functions. We demonstrate that the uncovered dopaminergic neuron subtypes encoded distinct aspects of fearful experiences such as valence or value, whereas distinct hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells responded differentially to ketamine-induced anesthesia. This ISICA method should be useful to better data mining of large-scale in vivo neural datasets, leading to novel insights into circuit dynamics associated with cognitions.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsPattern Recognition, Automated

Identifiers

PMID26212360
PMCPMC4515637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.