Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26212041›Full record

ReviewPaediatric and perinatal epidemiology2015

Poverty, Pregnancy, and Birth Outcomes: A Study of the Earned Income Tax Credit.

Rita Hamad, David H Rehkopf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Minimum Wage Policies and Obstetric Disorders in the U.S.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rita HamadDivision of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0730-4077
David H RehkopfDivision of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Funding

Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationKL2TR001083 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
Life course contexts and work - quantifying impacts on aging and chronic diseaseK01AG047280 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REHKOPF, DAVID H · 2014 to 2018
$632k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001083NCATS NIH HHS KL2-TR001083NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NIA NIH HHS K01 AG047280NIA NIH HHS K01-AG047280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEconomic interventions are increasingly recognised as a mechanism to address perinatal health outcomes among disadvantaged groups. In the US, the earned income tax credit (EITC) is the largest poverty alleviation programme. Little is known about its effects on perinatal health among recipients and their children. We exploit quasi-random variation in the size of EITC payments to examine the effects of income on perinatal health.

methodsThe study sample includes women surveyed in the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (n = 2985) and their children born during 1986-2000 (n = 4683). Outcome variables include utilisation of prenatal and postnatal care, use of alcohol and tobacco during pregnancy, term birth, birthweight, and breast-feeding status. We first examine the health effects of both household income and EITC payment size using multivariable linear regressions. We then employ instrumental variables analysis to estimate the causal effect of income on perinatal health, using EITC payment size as an instrument for household income.

resultsWe find that EITC payment size is associated with better levels of several indicators of perinatal health. Instrumental variables analysis, however, does not reveal a causal association between household income and these health measures.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that associations between income and perinatal health may be confounded by unobserved characteristics, but that EITC income improves perinatal health. Future studies should continue to explore the impacts of economic interventions on perinatal health outcomes, and investigate how different forms of income transfers may have different impacts.

Indexed as

Eligibility DeterminationEmploymentFemaleHumansIncomeIncome TaxInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaternal ExposureMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPovertyPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsSubstance-Related DisordersUnited Statesearned income tax creditincomeinstrumental variables analysisperinatal healthpoverty

Identifiers

PMID26212041
PMCPMC4536129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.