Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26212011›Full record

ArticleOncogene2016

Grb2 depletion under non-stimulated conditions inhibits PTEN, promotes Akt-induced tumor formation and contributes to poor prognosis in ovarian cancer.

Z Timsah, Z Ahmed, C Ivan, J Berrout, M Gagea, Y Zhou, G N A Pena, X Hu, C Vallien, C V Kingsley and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Z TimsahDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1000, Houston, TX, USA.
Z AhmedDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1000, Houston, TX, USA.
C IvanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-0168
J BerroutSchool of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
M GageaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 63, Houston, TX, USA.
Y ZhouDepartment of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
G N A PenaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
X HuDepartment of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
C VallienDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 63, Houston, TX, USA.
C V KingsleyDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1472, Houston, TX, USA.
Y LuDepartment of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
J F HancockDepartment of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
J LiuDepartment of Pathology/Laboratory Medicine, Division of Pathology/Lab Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
A B GladdenDepartment of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1010, Houston, TX, USA.
G B MillsDepartment of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
G Lopez-BeresteinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
M-C HungDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
A K SoodDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
M BogdanovDepartment Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
J E LadburyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1000, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON SPORE IN OVARIAN CANCERP50CA083639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BAST, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2015
$33.0M
Targeting the PI3K Signaling Pathway in Endometrial CarcinomaP50CA098258 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BODURKA, DIANE · 2003 to 2020
$32.0M
Texas Center for Cancer NanomedicineU54CA151668 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI FERRARI, MAURO · 2010 to 2014
$12.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083639NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098258NCI NIH HHS U54 CA151668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of extracellular stimulation the adaptor protein growth factor receptor-bound protein (Grb2) and the phospholipase Plcγ1 compete for the same binding site on fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2). Reducing cellular Grb2 results in upregulation of Plcγ1 and depletion of the phospholipid PI(4,5)P2. The functional consequences of this event on signaling pathways are unknown. We show that the decrease in PI(4,5)P2 level under non-stimulated conditions inhibits PTEN activity leading to the aberrant activation of the oncoprotein Akt. This results in excessive cell proliferation and tumor progression in a xenograft mouse model. As well as defining a novel mechanism of Akt phosphorylation with important therapeutic consequences, we also demonstrate that differential expression levels of FGFR2, Plcγ1 and Grb2 correlate with patient survival. Oncogenesis through fluctuation in the expression levels of these proteins negates extracellular stimulation or mutation and defines them as novel prognostic markers in ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinogenesisCell ProliferationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGRB2 Adaptor ProteinHumansMiceOncogene Protein v-aktOvarian NeoplasmsPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphatidylinositolsPhospholipase C gammaPrognosisPTEN PhosphohydrolaseReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2FGFR2 protein, humanGRB2 Adaptor ProteinGRB2 protein, humanOncogene Protein v-aktPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPhosphatidylinositolsPhospholipase C gammaPLCG1 protein, humanPTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2

Identifiers

PMID26212011
PMCPMC4792786
OpenAlexW1808881593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.