ArticleCurrent microbiology2015
Isolation and Identification of Arcobacter spp. by Multiplex PCR from Water Sources in Kars Region.
Article in Current microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogenicity assessment of Arcobacter butzleri isolated from Canadian agricultural surface water.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Arcobacter species isolated from various seafood and water sources; virulence genes, antibiotic resistance genes and molecular characterization.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Prevalence and antibacterial susceptibilities of Arcobacter spp. and Campylobacter spp. from fresh vegetables.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Article
- The Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Occurrence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Identification of 16S rRNA and Virulence-Associated Genes ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Development of a Quantitative PCR Assay for Arcobacter spp. and its Application to Environmental Water Samples.Microbes and environments · 2018Article
- EMA and EFSA Joint Scientific Opinion on measures to reduce the need to use antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry in the European Union, and the resulting impacts on food safety (RONAFA).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2017Article
- Isolation and identification of Arcobacter species from environmental and drinking water samples.Folia microbiologica · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of Arcobacter spp. in various water sources of stream, creek, pond, and drinking water in Kars and surrounding areas. A total of 113 water samples including 19 samples from creeks, 49 from streams, 10 from ponds, and 35 from drinking water samples collected from different regions were examined for presence of Arcobacter spp. by cultural methods. Arcobacter spp. were isolated from 14 (12.38 %) samples including 5 (26.31 %) creek and 9 (18.36 %) stream water samples and all were identified as Arcobacter butzleri by multiplex PCR. No agent was isolated from pond and drinking water samples. The results of this study demonstrated that creek and stream waters are contaminated by this agent showing high potential risk of Arcobacter species to be transmitted to humans and animals and in the contamination of food. It is concluded that water sources should also be considered as a factor not only carrying agents but also as a primary source of the infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26210902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.