Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26210344›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2016

Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases.

Luca Cindolo, Pietro Castellan, Cesare Marco Scoffone, Cecilia Maria Cracco, Antonio Celia, Andrea Paccaduscio, Luigi Schips, Silvia Proietti, Alberto Breda, Guido Giusti

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Luca CindoloDepartment of Urology, "S. Pio da Pietrelcina" Hospital, Via San Camillo de Lellis 1, 66054, Vasto, Italy. lucacindolo@virgilio.it.
Pietro CastellanDepartment of Urology, "SS. Annunziata" Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
Cesare Marco ScoffoneDepartment of Urology, "Cottolengo" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Cecilia Maria CraccoDepartment of Urology, "Cottolengo" Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Antonio CeliaDepartment of Urology, "San Bassiano" Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Italy.
Andrea PaccaduscioDepartment of Urology, Legnano Hospital, Legnano, Italy.
Luigi SchipsDepartment of Urology, "S. Pio da Pietrelcina" Hospital, Via San Camillo de Lellis 1, 66054, Vasto, Italy.
Silvia ProiettiStone Center at Department of Urology, "Humanitas Clinical and Research Center", Rozzano, Italy.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, "Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Fundaciò Puigvert", Barcelona, Spain.
Guido GiustiStone Center at Department of Urology, "Humanitas Clinical and Research Center", Rozzano, Italy.
CTO Hospital · ITEllis Hospital · USHumanitas University · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Civile di Legnano · ITOspedale San Bassiano · ITOspedale SS. Annunziata · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdvancements in the endourological equipment have made retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) an attractive, widespread technique, capable of competing with traditional shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Since the complication rate is generally low, even less is known about dramatic and fatal complications after RIRS.

methodsWe performed a survey asking 11 experienced endourologists to review their RIRS series and report the cases of mortality to their best knowledge.

resultsSix urologists reported on six fatal cases. In three cases, a history of urinary tract infections was present. Four patients died from urosepsis, one due to an anesthetic and one due to hemorrhagic complication. The use of ureteral access sheath was not common.

conclusionEven respecting the standards of care, it may happen that physicians are occasionally tempted to overdo for their patients, sometimes skipping safety rules with an inevitable increase in risks. Despite the fact that RIRS has become a viable option for the treatment of the majority of kidney stones, its complication rates remain low. Nevertheless, rare fatal events may occur, especially in complex cases with a history of urinary tract infections, and advanced neurological diseases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFatal OutcomeFemaleHumansItalyKidney CalculiMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival RateUreteroscopyComplicationsDeathFlexible ureteroscopyLaser lithotripsyRenal stoneRetrograde intrarenal surgery

Identifiers

PMID26210344
OpenAlexW1016221375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.