Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26210206›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2016

Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review.

Britt M Blokker, Ivo M Wagensveld, Annick C Weustink, J Wolter Oosterhuis, M G Myriam Hunink

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Article
  7. [Minimally invasive autopsies-Methods and limitations].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Minimally invasive autopsy - endoscopic approach to post-mortem diagnostics.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Britt M BlokkerDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivo M WagensveldDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Annick C WeustinkDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Wolter OosterhuisDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M G Myriam HuninkDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.hunink@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAutopsies are used for healthcare quality control and improving medical knowledge. Because autopsy rates are declining worldwide, various non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy methods are now being developed. To investigate whether these might replace the invasive autopsies conventionally performed in naturally deceased adults, we systematically reviewed original prospective validation studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched six databases. Two reviewers independently selected articles and extracted data. Methods and patient groups were too heterogeneous for meaningful meta-analysis of outcomes.

resultsSixteen of 1538 articles met our inclusion criteria. Eight studies used a blinded comparison; ten included less than 30 appropriate cases. Thirteen studies used radiological imaging (seven dealt solely with non-invasive procedures), two thoracoscopy and laparoscopy, and one sampling without imaging. Combining CT and MR was the best non-invasive method (agreement for cause of death: 70 %, 95%CI: 62.6; 76.4), but minimally invasive methods surpassed non-invasive methods. The highest sensitivity for cause of death (90.9 %, 95%CI: 74.5; 97.6, suspected duplicates excluded) was achieved in recent studies combining CT, CT-angiography and biopsies.

conclusionMinimally invasive autopsies including biopsies performed best. To establish a feasible alternative to conventional autopsy and to increase consent to post-mortem investigations, further research in larger study groups is needed. KEY POINTS: • Health care quality control benefits from clinical feedback provided by (alternative) autopsies. • So far, sixteen studies investigated alternative autopsy methods for naturally deceased adults. • Thirteen studies used radiological imaging modalities, eight tissue biopsies, and three CT-angiography. • Combined CT, CT-angiography and biopsies were most sensitive diagnosing cause of death.

Indexed as

AdultAngiographyAutopsyBiopsyCause of DeathHumansProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlternative clinical autopsyPost-mortem biopsiesPost-mortem imagingSystematic reviewValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID26210206
PMCPMC4778156
OpenAlexW1033460754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.