Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26210166›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2015

The effects of intravenous fosaprepitant and ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients who underwent lower limb surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Nami Kakuta, Katsuyoshi Kume, Eisuke Hamaguchi, Rie Tsutsumi, Naoji Mita, Katsuya Tanaka, Yasuo M Tsutsumi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nami KakutaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Katsuyoshi KumeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Eisuke HamaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Rie TsutsumiDepartment of Nutrition, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Naoji MitaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Katsuya TanakaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
Yasuo M TsutsumiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan. tsutsumi@tokushima-u.ac.jp.
Tokushima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is the most common complication after surgery, and opioid administration increases its incidence. We compared the preventive effects of fosaprepitant, a neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist, with those of ondansetron on PONV in patients who underwent lower limb surgery with postoperative epidural opioid administration.

methodsThis prospective, double-blind, randomized study included 38 patients who underwent lower limb surgery. They were randomly allocated to receive intravenous fosaprepitant 150 mg (n = 19; NK1 group) or ondansetron 4 mg (n = 19; ONS group) before general anesthesia. All patients received postoperative epidural fentanyl for pain control. The incidence of nausea and vomiting, complete response rate (no vomiting and no rescue antiemetic use), rescue antiemetic use, nausea score (0-3), and visual analog scale (VAS 0-10) score for pain were recorded at 2, 24, and 48 h after surgery.

resultsNo patient in the NK1 group experienced vomiting (0%) during the first 24 and 48 h after surgery, while 5 of 19 (26%) patients in the ONS group experienced this complication, indicating a significant difference between groups. There were no significant differences in the incidence of PONV, complete response rate, rescue antiemetic use, nausea score, and VAS score for pain between the NK1 and ONS groups during the study period.

conclusionsFosaprepitant was more effective than ondansetron in decreasing the incidence of vomiting after lower limb surgery with postoperative opioid administration. Meanwhile, fosaprepitant was not inferior to ondansetron in decreasing the incidence and severity of PONV.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralAntiemeticsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedMorpholinesOndansetronPostoperative Nausea and VomitingProspective StudiesAntiemeticsfosaprepitantMorpholinesOndansetronFosaprepitantLower limb surgeryNeurokinin-1 receptorPostoperative nausea and vomiting

Identifiers

PMID26210166
OpenAlexW1853778131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.