ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2016
Are biomarkers evaluated in biopsy specimens predictive of prostate cancer aggressiveness?
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of the Metzincin Superfamily in Prostate Cancer Progression: A Systematic-Like Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Pooled it
- TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusions in Prostate Cancer of West African Men and a Meta-Analysis of Racial Differences.American journal of epidemiology · 2017Pooled it
- Human papillomavirus infection among men and its role in the etiology of prostate cancer: A prospective study.Central European journal of urology · 2025Article
- Genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic signatures of prostate cancer between African American and European American patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- The vulnerable primed cancer stem cells in disguise: demystifying the role of Maspin.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2022Review
- Review
- Relationship between Gleason score and apparent diffusion coefficients of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer patients.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du CanadaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate biomarkers involved in biological pathways for prostate cancer (PCa) progression, measured in biopsy specimens, in order to distinguish patients at higher risk for fatal PCa and thus improve the initial management of disease.
methodsRetrospective case-control study. In 129 PCa patients who underwent ultrasound-guided needle prostate biopsy and subsequent radical prostatectomy from 1987 to 1999 at the University Hospital of Careggi, we evaluated: (1) mRNA expression of the serine 2 (TMPRSS2): erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (ERG); (2) expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and 9 (epithelial and stromal); (3) expression of androgen receptor; (4) expression of prognostic marker Ki67 (MIB1); (5) presence and typing of human papilloma virus; (6) DNA methylation of CpG islands of several genes involved in PCa progression.
resultsThe cohort consists of 38 cases (patients with PCa and died of PCa within 10 years from diagnosis) and 91 controls (patients with PCa but alive 10 years after diagnosis). Gleason bioptic score, epithelial MMP expression and SERPINB5 methylation correlated with statistically significant increase in death risk OR. Compared with patients with high level of MMP, patients with low level of MMP had OR for specific death 4.78 times higher (p = 0.0066). After adjustment for age and Gleason score, none of the investigated biomarkers showed increased OR for PCa death.
conclusionsOur preliminary results suggest that evaluation, in prostate biopsy specimens, of a panel of biomarkers known to be involved in PCa progression is poorly indicative of tumor outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.