ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015
Reliability and validity of the Turkish King's Health Questionnaire in women with urinary incontinence.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effectiveness of a Care Protocol Developed Using the Star Model on Female Patients With Stress Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Comparison of The Effects of Two Different Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Programs in Women With Stress Urinary İncontinence
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of High-Intensity Electromagnetic Therapy and Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises in Women with Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of women's health · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of Core Stabilization Exercises in Women with Stress and Stress-Dominant Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.International urogynecology journal · 2025Trial
- A Comparison of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises and Spinal Stabilization Exercises in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2025Trial
- Lifestyle recommendations and pelvic floor muscle training with Knack maneuver for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Effects of vaginal tampon training added to pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence: randomized controlled trial.International urogynecology journal · 2019Trial
- The effect of aerobic exercise on bladder function and lower urinary tract symptoms in women who have diabetes mellitus with lower urinary tract symptoms: a randomized controlled.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- The Effect of EMG biofeedback in female patients with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized sham controlled blinded clinical study.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Examination of the relationship between post-voiding residual urine volume and patient-reported urinary symptoms in postmenopausal women.BMC women's health · 2026Observational
- Comparison of the Effects of Different External Electrical Stimulation Applications in Women with Overactive Bladder.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Validation of the Hungarian version of the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) in women.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Validity and Reliability of the Turkish St. Mark's Incontinence Score.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychometric validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis in women with urinary incontinence.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Brazilian version of the King's Health Questionnaire: assessment of the structural validity and internal consistency in female urinary incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Trimester-based changes in urogenital symptoms and their impact on the quality of life in pregnant women: A preliminary report.Current urology · 2021Article
- Cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish CONTILIFE: a quality of life questionnaire for urinary incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2019Article
- Reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the Global Pelvic Floor Bother Questionnaire.International urogynecology journal · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to translate the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) into Turkish and to test its reliability and validity among Turkish women with urinary incontinence (UI).
methodsThree hundred and thirty-five women with symptoms of UI completed the Turkish versions of the KHQ, short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), and the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI). Psychometric analysis of the KHQ included assessments of test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct, and criterion validity. Factor analysis was used to explore the underlying structure of the KHQ.
resultsThe internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥0.68) and test-retest reliability of the KHQ were found to be high (p < 0.001). Interdomain correlation analysis showed good convergent validity among Role, Physical, and Social Limitations, with relatively higher correlations and divergent validity between Personal Relationships and other domains, with relatively lower correlations. Exploratory factor analysis identified three factors, namely, Daily Life and Emotions, Personal Relationship, and General Health Perception. The KHQ was also significantly correlated with IIQ-7, UDI-6, and ISI (p < 0.01).
conclusionsThe results suggest that the Turkish KHQ is a valid and reliable condition-specific quality of life instrument for Turkish women with UI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26209953What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.