Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26209802›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2015

Cortical and subcortical contributions to sequence retrieval: Schematic coding of temporal context in the neocortical recollection network.

Liang-Tien Hsieh, Charan Ranganath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Precise temporal dynamics of ripple events support order memory in human hippocampal-cortical circuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The history of episodic memory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Memory-Based Prediction Deficits and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Dysfunction in Schizophrenia.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Article
  14. The neural bases for timing of durations.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neural Evidence for Representational Persistence Within Events.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liang-Tien HsiehCenter for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95618, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address: lthsieh@stanford.edu.
Charan RanganathCenter for Neuroscience, University of California at Davis, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95618, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Fractionating Prefrontal Contributions to MemoryR01MH068721 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI RANGANATH, CHARAN · 2005 to 2014
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic memory entails the ability to remember what happened when. Although the available evidence indicates that the hippocampus plays a role in structuring serial order information during retrieval of event sequences, information processed in the hippocampus must be conveyed to other cortical and subcortical areas in order to guide behavior. However, the extent to which other brain regions contribute to the temporal organization of episodic memory remains unclear. Here, we examined multivoxel activity pattern changes during retrieval of learned and random object sequences, focusing on a neocortical "core recollection network" that includes the medial prefrontal cortex, retrosplenial cortex, and angular gyrus, as well as on striatal areas including the caudate nucleus and putamen that have been implicated in processing of sequence information. The results demonstrate that regions of the core recollection network carry information about temporal positions within object sequences, irrespective of object information. This schematic coding of temporal information is in contrast to the putamen, which carried information specific to objects in learned sequences, and the caudate, which carried information about objects, irrespective of sequence context. Our results suggest a role for the cortical recollection network in the representation of temporal structure of events during episodic retrieval, and highlight the possible mechanisms by which the striatal areas may contribute to this process. More broadly, the results indicate that temporal sequence retrieval is a useful paradigm for dissecting the contributions of specific brain regions to episodic memory.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental RecallNeocortexNeostriatumNerve NetTime FactorsYoung AdultDefault networkfMRIRecollection networkSequenceTemporal context

Identifiers

PMID26209802
PMCPMC4604031
OpenAlexW1001416038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.