ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2015
Metal biouptake by actively growing cells of metal-tolerant bacterial strains.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimony resistant bacteria isolated from Budúcnosť adit (Pezinok-Kolársky vrch deposit) in western Slovakia.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Chromium contamination accentuates changes in the microbiome and heavy metal resistome of a tropical agricultural soil.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Mercury removal during growth of mercury tolerant and self-aggregating Yarrowia spp.AMB Express · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal uptake potentials of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CA207Ni, Burkholderia cepacia CA96Co, Rhodococcus sp. AL03Ni, and Corynebacterium kutscheri FL108Hg were studied to determine their competence in detoxification of toxic metals during growth. Metabolism-dependent metal biouptake of the bacteria revealed appreciable uptake of the metals (57-61, 10-30, 23-60, and 10-16 mg g dw(-1) of Ni(2+), Cr(6+), Co(2+), and Cd(2+), respectively) from medium, after initial drop in pH, without lag phase. The bacteria exhibited 95-100% removal efficiency for the metals from aqueous medium as 21 (±0.8)-84 (±2.0) concentration factors of the metals were transported into the bacterial systems. Passive adsorption onto the cell surfaces occurred within 2-h contact, and afterwards, there was continuous accumulation for 12 days. Biosorption data of the bacteria were only fitted into Langmuir isotherm model when strains AL96Co, CA207Ni, and AL03Ni interacted with Ni(2+), achieving maximum uptake of 9.87, 2.72, and 2.69 mg g dw(-1), respectively. This study established that the actively growing bacterial strains displayed, at least, 97.0% (±1.5) continuous active removals of metals upon adsorption. The bacteria would be good candidates for designing bioreactor useful in the detoxification campaign of heavy metal-polluted systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.