Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26208818›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2015

Pediatric trauma care with computed tomography--criteria for CT scanning.

Markus Muhm, Tim Danko, Thomas Henzler, Thomas Luiz, Hartmut Winkler, Thomas Ruffing

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Imaging techniques in modern trauma diagnostics].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Markus MuhmDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery; Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg and University of Mainz, Hellmut-Hartert-Str. 1, D-67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany. mmuhm@westpfalz-klinikum.de.
Tim DankoDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery; Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg and University of Mainz, Hellmut-Hartert-Str. 1, D-67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Thomas HenzlerInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas LuizDENIT - German Institute for Emergency Medicine and Information Technology, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE), Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Hartmut WinklerDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery; Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg and University of Mainz, Hellmut-Hartert-Str. 1, D-67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Thomas RuffingDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery; Westpfalz-Klinikum Kaiserslautern, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg and University of Mainz, Hellmut-Hartert-Str. 1, D-67655, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEFraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trauma centers, trauma management concepts, as well as integration of whole-body computed tomography (CT) reduced mortality significantly. The accuracy of a trauma care algorithm with emergency CT in children was evaluated. Data of 71 children with emergency CT were recorded retrospectively. In addition to epidemiological data admission date, kind of CT scan, mechanism of injury, missed diagnoses, injury severity score (ISS), admission to and time on intensive care unit (ICU), and time of hospitalization were observed. The algorithm for CT scanning was based on mechanism of injury, pattern of injury, and altered vital signs. Sixty-nine percent of the children reached the ER during on-call service hours. A percentage of 32.4 received a whole-body scan and 67.6 % a cranial scan. The mean ER ISS was 9.9 points (1-57). Children have different trauma mechanisms compared to adults. A percentage of 33.8 of the children had relevant trauma related findings in the CT scan. In 2 children, (2.8 %) 3 diagnoses (2.2 %) were initially missed. After reevaluation of the CT data, all diagnoses were identified. Thus, the accuracy of our algorithm in children was 100 %. In children, our algorithm detected all injuries, but only one third of the children had relevant trauma related findings in the CT scan. In order to reduce radiation exposure but preserve the advantages of CT, a new algorithm was developed with more flexibility taking the child's age and mental status more into account as well as clinical findings. The mechanism of injury itself is not anymore an indication for CT scanning.

Indexed as

AdolescentAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolDiagnostic ErrorsGermanyHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInjury Severity ScoreIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTrauma CentersVital SignsComputed tomographyCriteria for CT scanningMechanism of injuryPediatric traumaRadiation dose reduction

Identifiers

PMID26208818
OpenAlexW936976566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.